We all know a cover can make or break a book. Sometimes, a cover will make the story read younger or older than intended and sometimes, it’ll be spot on. A recent trend, though, has been changing the hard cover cover when a book goes to paperback. If you’re a regular reader over at Alea’s blog, she does a regular hardcover vs paperback feature, and it’s something that always interests me. Sometimes the changes are obvious and make sense and other times, I don’t get it at all.
Here’s a few I’ve noticed recently in the YA world that are both exciting me and confusing me greatly.
Sarah Dessen’s Along for the Ride in hard cover. I like this cover — it’s simple, yet it does pretty much capture the story right there. But, you know, it had to be redesigned for paper back release. This will be a shocking change.
Auden is now wearing a red dress. I don’t get it. I will admit that I think Auden is more of a red dress kinda girl than a pink dress kinda girl, but why the change for the paperback? Composition wise, I actually think pink was a better choice, as it didn’t overwhelm the cover in red.
Next up, a cover change I quite like and one I think will resonate with readers a little more.
Wolves, Boys, & Other Things That Might Kill Me by Kristen Chandler has the title trend I kind of hate, which is the trilogy of “things” in a row. Cover wise, this one doesn’t really grab me at all. The wolf looks like a nice dog, actually.
But this paperback? This is fantastic. I love the fact nature is the huge force in the cover, and I think that the girl being barefoot in the water really captures a sense of fear. The title font works, as do the different colors. There is an entirely different feel to this book, and it actually compels me to pick it up more than the other one (which looks a little too much like every other paranormal book, as the girl suffers windswept hair syndrome).
Here’s a cover I’ve talked about before. I like this cover, but it’s nothing too special. I’m not sure quite how much it conveys the story nor the tone of the story (which is pretty light-hearted). This one’s had a bit of a makeover, too.
It’s not bad, but it falls into yet another cover trend which is the orange cover. I love the color, but I think the impact has worn out a bit. The coffee mug with the heart in cream has been done a few times, as well. But what I do like here are the arms and the blue shirt sleeves against the orange. And the font works really well, too. This cover feels more light-hearted than the hard cover.
I love the cover of Julie Halpern’s Into the Wild Nerd Yonder and liked the story quite a bit (minus the fact the main character totally back tracks on her belief in not judging/changing people in the end). The image here works well, as it captures both the Ren fair idea and the role that Dungeons and Dragons plays in the story. The pink also really captures the mood and makes the story feel contemporary. Note the tag line: My life on the dork side.
But then they went and did this to the paperback:
I hate, hate, hate the change, both as a reader and as a librarian. First, it’s a horrific combination of colors that does nothing but go back to the idea that books are dated and old and not cool. It’s a weird yellow shade and the font and color selection for the title screams 1970s. Don’t get me started on the dorky clothing, either. The people in this story are not DORKS in that sense. They’re geeks — they like to play role playing games and go to Ren Fairs, which does not mean they dress like people who haven’t seen a mirror. This plays into some pretty ridiculous stereotypes I don’t like at all. And please note: the tag line now reads “High school on the dork side.” There’s just such a lower level of appeal to this cover, and it’s really unfortunate how much a disservice it does to potential readers. It tries way too hard.
While we’re on cover changes that don’t work for me, here’s another one.
I love the cover for Dirty Little Secrets by CJ Omololu. I think Lucy’s captured pretty well, and you just feel like you’re stepping into a story about hoarding and about broken promises and dreams. A book about a dirty secret. The cover has an immediacy and contemporary feel. It works for me as a reader.
But the paperback seems to suffer from the dating issue. This book reminds me of books from the 1980s. And actually, for some reason it reminds me of the original Babysitter’s Club book covers. I hate the font on the title, since it definitely dates it, and I just don’t find myself connecting with the girl on the cover. It makes the story feel like the story is about her secret, when really, it’s not a book about her secret. And the background within the key hole looks way too clean. Frankly, I don’t think she’s got much of a secret here, no less a dirty one. The paper back doesn’t work for me at all.
You know why I love the cover for Matthew Quick’s Sorta Like A Rock Star? It’s quiet. It’s not really a stand out kinda cover. And this is important — this isn’t the kinda story that needs a loud cover to grab a reader’s attention. The story does it all on its own. There’s enough mystery in just the title and the shadowy girl in the background to invite readers into the story.
But then…
I’m of mixed opinion about the paper back. First, I dig the reddish pink cover. I dig the font and title placement. Know what I hate? Hair-in-her-face girl. This isn’t a story about a rock star. That is a bit misleading. Also, she’s far too pretty. She’s dressed far too well to be the person in the story, too. I think this cover is a little too flashy for the story and might be the ultimate disappointment for readers expecting a much louder, more rock star-esque story.
One more! This one I share because I love how the cover change to this particular book lets it work for two entirely different audiences (in a good way).
Tanita Davis’s Mare’s War has such a great middle grade cover. I love that it features the fact the girls and the grandmother in the story who are African American are depicted as such on the cover. But here’s the thing: this cover doesn’t work for older readers. This book works easily for an 11-18 year old audience, but the cover appeal is geared younger. But oh, what an awesome thing they did for the paperback:
Is this not gorgeous? It gets to the badassness that the story portrays in the grandmother, while it also has incredible appeal and respect for what she was doing in the story. This is also not a black girl on a cover who has been Photoshopped to look white (which happens far more than anyone would admit). This book cover has appeal for older readers in particular. I love that the transformation in this one doesn’t change the story but instead opens it to a wider audience.
Thoughts? This is obviously just a small sample of some of the cover changes that have happened recently, but they’re all ones that really struck me as meaningful in one way or another.
simmone says
I love this post! I kind of liked the wild nerd cover – but it does make it look very 80s and more like revenge of the nerds. Someone should do a series where authors get to create their own covers (except there would be no way of doing this without insulting yr publisher and confusing people)
Katie says
Oh, I looove both covers for Mare's War, but the second option is just stunning. I almost want to hang it on my wall!
Abby says
For the Sarah Dessen, I think the pink makes the girl seem younger and the red makes the girl seem older. So maybe that's why the change?
I hate the second Wild Nerd Yonder cover, too. I think it makes the book look too young.
And I loooove the paperback cover for Mare's War!
Sarah B. says
Wow! Great post! I completely agree from top to bottom (and now I've got a few more books to read). I would've never given Mare's War a second look with the original cover, but the paperback makes me want to read it TODAY. And that peeping through the lock cover is TOTALLY 80s & Babysitters Club-esque.
Melissa Walker says
GREAT post. I agree on all, esp Mare's War, which got the SWAN of makeovers here. I don't mind the red dress switch on Sarah D's book–maybe they wanted her name to be bolder and had to match it? The new WOLVES cover is fantastic. Emailing Kristen right now!
A Library Girl says
I'll preface my comment by saying I haven't read any of these and know almost nothing about any of them.
The only cover I disagree with you about is the Chandler one. No, I don't really like the first cover – I think the layout and general look is a bit awkward, and I hate hard-edged Photoshop-y copy and paste jobs. However, both now and as a teenager, I can see myself glomming on to the image of that girl – I've got a guilty pleasure thing going with moody-looking characters. The second cover is more aesthetically pleasing but doesn't have anything about it that would make me pick it up.
That said, I just read a description of the book on Amazon, and the second cover sounds like a better fit for the book. With the current YA paranormal trend, the first cover would lead me to expect a YA paranormal with werewolves – a book that would be right up my alley. I hate, with a passion, picking up a book expecting one thing and then getting something entirely different. If the book turns out to be good, I tend to be less upset, but because I expect something else going in, I might not be in the proper mindset to enjoy the book.
I absolutely love the look of the first Dirty Little Secrets cover and second Mare's War cover. I wouldn't touch either book if I saw them with their other cover versions. Again, though, the covers should convey the actual feel and general subject of the book (I'm too cynical to expect details to be correct).
Sarah says
Gah, I'll be sad when my library copy of Into the Wild Nerd Yonder bites the dust because I do not want the new cover in my library. Terrible.
Ashley @ Book Labyrinth says
Ew, I hate the paperback of 'Into the Wild Nerd Yonder' … I seriously loved that book, and the first cover was so unique. The second one is just… ugh. It doesn't represent the story AT ALL. And the colours are hideous.
The Sarah Dessen change doesn't make sense to me, either… like you said, not that Auden is a pink dress kind of girl, but…. the 2nd one is just RED in a really awkward way. Glad I have the hardcover!
storytimekatie says
The paperback for "Into the Wild Nerd Yonder" is atrocious! So sad that it went through such a change.
But I love the change for "Wolves, Boys, and Other Things That Might Kill Me."
thatcovergirl says
Ahhh, I love Alea's Hardcover vs. Paperback posts, too.
The PB for Wild Nerd Yonder makes me laugh! It's so bad, it's like someone time-traveled to the 80's, found the most hideous stereotype of a geek that they could, and threw it on the cover. Wow. That's not even right.
As for Mare's War, while I did like the illustrated version, it's the hardcover that made me instantly want to read it. I'll be featuring it on the blog soon, along with interviews from Davis & the editor/designer.
tanita davis says
"…which does not mean they dress like people who haven't seen a mirror. This plays into some pretty ridiculous stereotypes I don't like at all."
🙂
I love cover discussions. And thank you for the kind words; I'm so happy that the new cover bumps up the reading audience age range!
Michelle says
I'm totally with you on the Dessen cover, the change was so miniscule why bother? Like you I think Auden was more red than pink but also like you I felt like the pink wasn't so overpowering.