Cia lives in Five Lakes colony, the region of the country that used to be the Great Lakes, but is now a blighted region thanks to the Seven Stages War, a terrible conflict that killed millions and left most of the world environmentally destroyed. The United Commonwealth is now focused on revitalizing the country, clearing out the deadly toxins from the water and forcing the Earth to grow food again.
To do this, the country needs leaders. When they graduate from school at 16, all children become eligible for the Testing, a series of rigorous tests that determine entry into the the country’s (apparently only) college. Cia is one of the select few chosen to compete. She has no choice in the matter, but she’s happy to go; she knows it’s the only way to get into college and she’s eager to help lead the healing of the Earth.
But the Testing is not what it seems. Before she leaves, Cia’s father – who participated in the Testing – tells her that though all participants’ minds are wiped of memories of the Testing to ensure no inside information can be given to others, he’s been plagued by disturbing half-memories. He remembers violence, death, terrible things children did to each other. He warns Cia not to trust anyone. He tells her that most people who go to the Testing – the ones who don’t pass – aren’t ever seen again.
So, does this synopsis sound familiar to you? It should – it’s basically the Hunger Games. And I don’t mean that in the way Divergent or Legend are like the Hunger Games. Those two books certainly have strong similarities, but The Testing takes it to a whole new level. The bulk of the book involves, unsurprisingly, an arena-like test where the teens must make it from one part of the blighted country (human-made obstacles included) to another, and only a certain number who make it will be admitted. They quickly learn that it’s to their advantage to thin the herd. There’s also another boy from her colony who Cia may or may not have a crush on, but can she trust him? Is his affection just a clever ruse?
I think it’s interesting that Kirkus (usually the more unforgiving of review journals) claims that Charbonneau “successfully makes her story her own.” I don’t agree with that statement completely. It’s not a carbon copy, but the aspects that are similar are eerily similar, in a way that seems to verge worryingly close to theft. I realize this is a pretty strong statement, and I thought a long time about how I’d remark on it. I felt it was important to share, though, so there you have it.
Despite all of that, though, this is a fantastic book. I know. If the Hunger Games didn’t exist and I’d never read it, I’d be shouting this book’s praises all over the place. But the Hunger Games does exist, I have read it, and The Testing owes so much to it (including its very existence, most likely). We don’t read in a vacuum, and I can’t and shouldn’t pretend that we do. But I also feel it’s important to judge a book on its own merits without necessarily comparing it to something else, and on its own, this book is fantastic.
Actually, I liked it more than the Hunger Games, which I enjoyed but didn’t love immediately. I found the premise of the Hunger Games a little harder to believe and its depiction of the terrible things adults force upon the children in their care a bit heavy-handed. The Testing couches its violence in something that I think is more immediately relatable to teens – the competition for admittance to college – and shows the consequences of what we do to our children (intentionally or not) in a slightly more nuanced way.
Enough with the Hunger Games comparisons, though. The Testing affected me in a visceral way, and I can honestly say that no other book in recent memory has gotten my heart rate going quite like this one has. I resented having to go to work in the morning because all I wanted to do was read this book. Charbonneau is a master of suspense, of creating tension so taut that it hurts to keep reading but hurts just as much to stop. I wanted to turn the pages faster, faster, but at the same time I had to force myself to slow down because I didn’t want to miss a single word. This is the kind of book that makes readers bite their fingernails until their fingers bleed, tug bits of hair out, shout at their significant others to leave them alone because goddammit they are reading, can’t you see?
Beyond that aspect, there are some truly creative things going on here. I found the tests prior to the main survival round hugely interesting and quite unique in their own right, particularly the third round one involving teamwork. It’s a great example of some creative plotting as well as character-building, and is the first real opportunity we get to see how ruthless children can be. The way Charbonneau gradually moves the tests from completely innocuous to more and more sinister is masterfully done.
The Testing does have its weaknesses. Cia isn’t a hugely memorable character (though neither is she flat). There’s not much background about the Seven Stages War, which is something that frustrates me in any dystopia I read. Some elements of the plot are easy to see coming – betrayals, alliances, deaths. Still, Charbonneau throws in enough twists to keep readers thoroughly engrossed, and like I mentioned before, it’s nearly impossible to stop reading it once you start.
So, obviously, this is a perfect book for your fans of the Hunger Games and other action-packed dystopias. I’d love to discuss it with other readers and get their views on its similarities. This is one I see people having very strong reactions to one way or the other. For myself, I’m really looking forward to the sequel.
Review copy received from the publisher. The Testing will be published June 4.
Aren't Kirkus reviews paid for? I never read anything they recommend.
No, the vast majority are not. They have a small section at the back of the magazine that they call "indie" which are mostly self-pubbed and are paid for. The others are reviewed like usual.
I am really curious about this book. I've seen a whole range of reviews for it. And it does sound an awful lot like the Hunger Games. But still the premise is interesting and I would like to read it for myself
What did you think about Tomas as a character? I felt like he started as such a strong character but slowly faded as the story progressed.
I didn't think any of the ancillary characters were really memorable, including Tomas. Cia gets better – more interesting and three-dimensional – as the series progresses.
What did you think of Tomas as a character? I thought he started really strong, but faded as the story progressed. Like there wasn't a good character balance between him and Cia.