I read this blog post last week, and I have been thinking about it since then. If you haven’t, it’s very short and it’s nothing more than an announcement of a 10,000 word addition to Abbi Glines’s The Vincent Boys (published by Simon Pulse, a YA imprint of Simon & Schuster). The addition to this book is, as Glines explains, “explicit, adult sexual content.” This extended edition of the book is an ebook original and only in ebook format.
Then I read this article. Nicole Williams, who originally self-published her ebook Crash series, was picked up by Harper. They’re soon going to be available as paperback editions, and each of them will be categorized for readers 16 and older. That’s because they’re “steamy teen romances” about an “all-consuming affair” between a new girl in town and the resident bad boy. It follows them post-high school.
I’m not the type of reader or librarian to shy away from topics in YA books. I think it’s important to represent a wide breadth of different viewpoints, of different issues, and I think it’s crucial for teens who want to be exposed to topics have the chance to be exposed that way through books written for them. Reading about sex and the sexual experience in YA lit is not only powerful, but it’s critical to teens in a variety of ways. This post, written earlier this year, does a great job of explaining why sex scenes are important to the development of teen sexuality, especially for girls.
In high school, I read Forever and I read Are You There God, It’s Me Margaret. I didn’t have as wide an exposure to YA lit in high school as teens do today, but I do remember reading those two books and feeling normal. The sex and discussions of sexuality in each is not pretty, it’s not easy, it’s not clean. It’s uncomfortable at times for the characters and for the reader. If it wasn’t — if it was easy, if it was not awkward to read and think about — then sex itself wouldn’t be such a big deal. Because for teens especially, sex is a big deal.
My first year in college — the first days in college — when suddenly there were no adults around and very few rules regarding living in a dorm (let alone a coed dorm) and when we were still very much teenagers at 17, 18, and 19, there was a lot of talking and thinking about sex. There was a group of us who used to stay up late every night, talking about any and everything, and inevitably, the discussion of sex would come up. Who had had sex, what the experience was like. The group of about 7 to 10 of us had a wide variety of experience, but nearly none of us had actually had sex. But over the course of that year, everyone did.
Over the course of that year, I don’t ever recall anyone saying their first or second or eightieth experience having sex was erotic or explicit and certainly nothing was described as an all consuming affair. This was the case for people who’d become very involved with a romantic partner, as well as those who didn’t.
I’ve had teenagers ask me questions in the past, and I’ve had teenagers approach me for resources and books that would allow them to understand what sex was like. It’s one of those questions that, when you’re working with teenagers and you’re passionate about working with teenagers, you don’t even blush at because you expect that much of them. For me, it’s stepping back and remembering high school and that first year of college. What would I have wanted to know? More than just reflecting on that, though, is knowing that offering a wide variety of resources that highlight this messy, awkward, terrifying, and exciting new experience is the best way to allow that teen to figure it out. I take this responsibility as a gatekeeper and as an adult with whom a teen is seeking delicate information very seriously.
I believe in sex positivity. I don’t shy away from reading and accepting certain sexual situations in YA novels that are painful. Kimberly has talked about sexual violence as a plot device before, and part of why I find that to be a tough thing to read is because it’s a reality of sex. It’s a reality, too, of being a woman. I don’t have to like reading it, but I read it because it is there for a purpose (even if, like Kim, I can find it a troubling purpose at times). There are YA books that use sex as a game and as a tool of power. But even in those stories, the way sex is described, the experience of it, the feelings attached to it, are very much teen. I think, for example, of Margie Gelbwasser’s Pieces of Us, where yes, there is pretty descriptive use of sex as power among the teens. But the way those teens react in those situations — the way it haunts them, the way it makes them feel as a person and feel toward other people — is honest and true to teen behavior.
That said, the problem I take with the Glines novel and the Williams series is that the way they’re being sold and marketed is not for a teen readership. Reread the description of The Vincent Boys: 10,000 words of explicit, adult content. Even though this expanded edition will be only available for those who chose to purchase it for their ereaders, the book is still beneath a teen imprint. This is a teen book. A teen book with “explicit, adult content.”
The Williams series is purposefully being sold as a book for those 16 and older because it’s not meant for younger teen readers. It follows a couple through college and it follows their very physical and emotional “all-consuming affair.” I won’t go into the details of the problems I have with the “bad boy” casting of a character, but rather, the real issue I have here is that despite the fact the publisher is aware this isn’t a book appropriate for all teen readers, it was purchased under one of their children’s imprints and will be sold to teen readers. As — if not more — problematic is the line in that story conflating a trend for realistic stories with sexually-explicit stories. They know readers want more mature stories post-high school.
But that does not mean these are books for teens nor that teen readers should even have this on the table as a teen book.
Much of this goes back to the discussion of what “new adult” is or is not. I’ve already talked at length about my feelings on the issue. The “new adult” label is another way of saying adult books. There have been plenty of books published for younger adults, featuring teen or 20-something characters. This isn’t a new thing. Even if adults are the biggest purchaser of YA fiction, they’re not the intended audience. That’s TEENS. Teens deserve books that serve them.
So if books like this are going to be on the market — Glines’s as ebook only or not is not the issue seeing the Williams book will be put in print — then there needs to be a serious discussion of what the lines are between teen fiction and adult fiction. Because these books are adult books. They feature teen characters, but they are adult in their exploration of sex and sexual situations. Especially when the descriptions of the books are explicit in stating that the content is adult.
There is a place for these books that want to use older teen characters and put them in potentially erotic, mature sexual situations. That’s the adult market. That’s the romance market. That’s the market for erotica. As I mentioned in my post on “new adult” books, there’s a real stigma that’s unfairly attached to adult books, and I think that’s even more true for romance and erotica.
What these books are doing is not new. There have been thousands of books published featuring steamy situations. Many have included teenagers (probably more of the college variety than the high school variety). But what’s new here is how they’re being sold to teenagers.
Sex in YA is important, but sex in YA is not about being a steamy affair nor about being explicit and adult. It’s about being awkward, about being confusing and scary, about being really huge experience that can be horrible or can be really amazing. There’s an incredible range of experiences and exploring that within YA is perfectly acceptable and possible. But the key is it is about that exploration. Teen sexual situations are not, however, adult nor are they erotic. These are two charged words. Those are components of adult sexuality. Even books like Beth Bauman’s Jersey Angel, which is all about the sexual awakening of a teenage girl, only ever puts Angel in sexual situations that are very, very teen and entirely about the exploration. It is, at times, sexy but it is not erotic.
Thinking back to being a gatekeeper and thinking back to my own experience as a teenager, as well as the experiences others have shared with me (teens and friends alike), I worry, too. It would be easy to be insecure if you’re reading a story with very adult sexual situations — either purposefully or inadvertently — and then use that as a yardstick for your own experience. That’s not to say readers who read books with sex in them do so to learn or take notes. But there are a good portion who do. And if these books are “teen” books, and the message these books are sending, even through simply their marketing pitch, is that sex is steamy and erotic and very adult, then that’s a potentially scary message to receive. Think about how many adults felt insecure or somehow disempowered after reading 50 Shades of Grey.
I want teen readers to have a safe space to discover sex in its myriad of forms. I think this, though, is a line that shouldn’t be crossed. It’s my job to be a mentor and a gatekeeper, and even if I am open and honest about any and all topics, there are places I have to put my foot down and say it’s not okay. This is one of them. If a teen wants an adult book featuring sex? I’m happy to provide it for them. But if a teen wants a teen book featuring sex? I’m not going to give them an adult book with very adult themes in it. I’m not only not doing my job — I’m not being fair to them.
Gabrielle Prendergast says
Interesting dilemma. I think this speaks to the lack of awkwardness in all "erotic" books. Because I do think the ultimate fantasy for readers both male and female is to have that perfectly un-awkward erotic experience. Maybe that's unattainable, or at the very least very rare, teenage or not.
So I guess maybe we should be saying sexually escapist books are fine for adults, in the same way that books (more often movies, like Arthur for example) that make a joke out of being an alcoholic or drug addict are OK for mature readers or viewers, but that genuine teen readers should be exposed to a bit of realism first, before escaping into erotica. By that logic, teen books should have MORE sex (as long as it's realistic) not less because it provides an essential counterpoint to the always escapist porn that they can't avoid (not that they want to). If only there was YA porn with flabby pimple faced teens having awkward unsatisfying trysts ending in tears or humiliation (frequently both) we'd be saved a world of problems as we grow up sexually.
Carrie says
YES!
Christina says
"The "new adult" label is another way of saying adult books." THIS.
You should check out Uses for Boys. I've heard that one is perhaps overly explicit.
Sarah (Clear Eyes, Full Shelves) says
I feel like this trend (driven by the "highly dramatic" "new adult" phenomenon) toward stories featuring "all consuming" type relationships is worrisome. I realize it's an extension of the Twilight thing, but it bothers me more now that it's really "the thing" in a certain niche of contemporary fiction that's being marketed to a younger audience. A relationship that's "all consuming" is not one that's healthy… Good grief.
Anyway… you make so many excellent points in this post. Sex is important in YA but I too feel that the intention shouldn't be to depict it as "erotic," because it's really not. While I had some issues with the plot in Huntley Fitzpatrick's My Life Next Door, that book stuck with me because the author chose not to close the door when the main characters took that step in their relationship and she depicted it really sensitively and authentically. That scene was rather mortifying to read, but it was "real." (There's a line about socks that is fantastic.) Jennifer Echols does a good job with this as well.
Teens have a right to expect authentic (both physically and emotionally) depictions of situations that are relavent to their lives, not adult experiences with a YA/NA wrapper.
Justina! says
*10,000 words of explicit, adult content*
I'm a grown ass woman and I don't even have 10,000 words of explicit, adult content…
Carrie says
"Sex in YA is important, but sex in YA is not about being a steamy affair nor about being explicit and adult. It's about being awkward, about being confusing and scary, about being really huge experience that can be horrible or can be really amazing. There's an incredible range of experiences and exploring that within YA is perfectly acceptable and possible. But the key is it is about that exploration. Teen sexual situations are not, however, adult nor are they erotic."
Can we stitch this on a sampler or screen it on a t-shirt? I would buy several and give them out as gifts.
EROTIC involves skill and experience and privacy and confidence and great comfort with risk.
^Nobody has that when they're having sex as a teenager. Even 'bad boys' who are supernatural or whatever the fuck.
I'm off to Tweet this post FAR and WIDE. Bravo, Kelly.
Daisy Whitney says
I completely agree. I also wish there was less violence in books for teens.
Melinda J Harrison says
Great post. Thank you.
C.K. says
Kelly, I share all your concerns and issues (so eloquently laid out in this post) with what are essentially erotic adult books about teenagers.
Unfortunately, it seems this is only the beginning of a trend.
And what Sarah said: "Teens have a right to expect authentic (both physically and emotionally) depictions of situations that are relavent to their lives, not adult experiences with a YA/NA wrapper." Yes!!!!
molly @ wrapped up in books says
Great post, Kelly. I've been thinking about this a lot too and you raise some good points.
Heidi @ YA Bibliophile says
Amen. This is the far more eloquent version of my thoughts as well. No. Just no.
Liz Fichera says
Thank you for writing this post.
C.K. says
To be honest I'm wondering how I should categorize my self-published book after reading this. So far I've been referring to it as both adult and "new adult" because of the main character's age and editors' reactions to the material (almost all said she was too old for YA and too young for adult fiction). Some of the sex is awkward and, I think, more realistic than erotic, but there is definitely more sexual content than in my YA books. This is giving me much pause for thought.
Kim S says
I came across your post through Twitter and I really enjoyed all you had to say about YA sex. I'm not against it. If the author wants to be detailed in their descriptions then who am I to tell them what to write? But I worry how teens are accessing them. I haven't been out of the "teen" world for very long, and I'm pretty shocked seeing heavily detailed romances in YA books.
Just thought I'd note that the explicit Vincent Boys/Vincent Brothers book (the sequel is apparently going to be extended too) aren't just ebooks, the UK and Australian paperback editions are uncut too. When I bought a copy here in Australia from Dymocks, my book had a "Parental Warning: Explicit Content" sticker on the back. But I was still shocked at what I found inside because I thought it was a YA/Teen book – that's where it was shelved. They're now selling them in the major department stores over here, still in the Teen section, but without any explicit content warning stickers.
I hate to sound like sex shouldn't be in books, because I agree that books help teens understand situations better, but I do worry.
Kim
Sarah says
Do you think this is a U.S. only reservation? I'm just thinking of some place like the UK or even Europe where a lot of their TV shows based around teenagers are much more explicit than those shown in the US. And with a lot less backlash.
I realize books versus TV is not a direct comparison but it does often mimic the culture.
I know I have no desire to read these books nor purchase them for my library but I'll be curious to see if this trend gains traction or faces much hue and outcry.
Cassie @ Knowsprose says
I've been wondering if there's really a niche here for the publisher to aim at or if they're just trying to make one where one doesn't exist? It's like you say, don't teens who want to read an erotic romance usually go for an adult book anyway? And as for crossover potential, would adults really prefer to read about teens having sex than, you know, adults? Something just seems vaguely off about the whole thing.
Ann Stampler says
This is such an important discussion for us to be having. Thanks for this post. I must say, though, that while the distinctions make a great deal of sense as we talk about them — exploratory versus erotic; honest versus exploitive; and especially all-consuming versus obsessive — they can be difficult to tease out in practice.
I write about high-school aged teenagers, some of whom have sex. And while I'm pretty clear on what creeps me out (and is not found in my books), it's more one of those Justice Potter Stewart on obscenity, I-know-it-when-I-see-it, kinds of things than a standard I can articulate and apply to my writing. I see myself putting out passages that resonate for sixteen-year-old readers but not for forty-five year old pervs, hunched over in their dark basements. But as soon as the teen protagonist unhooks her bra (whether or not there are 10,000 words of her doing so), and particularly if she's depicted as fully involved in an intense experience, there are undeniable issues.