I spend a lot of my time thinking about the way we classify things (which may be one reason I became a librarian). This is probably most apparent in my Twitter feed, where I can often be found ruminating on the different kinds of genre fiction and their endless subgenres and overlaps and combinations. A listserv discussion about how to classify Marie Rutkoski’s excellent The Winner’s Curse (more on this title later) has me thinking a lot about fantasy novels without any magic, and about what is really required for a book to be fantasy.
I think a lot of readers are under the impression that fantasy requires magic as a matter of course. If it doesn’t have magic, then it must at least have beings that don’t exist in our own world, like dragons. This is an easy, though incorrect, assumption to make. Most fantasy novels do have magic. But not all.
Fantasy is, in my opinion, the genre with the most creative potential. Writers can quite literally do anything in a fantasy novel. It doesn’t matter if it could never happen in our own world – that’s the whole point. That’s what makes it exciting. You should be reading about things that could never possibly exist or happen. And you don’t need magic to achieve that.
Most of these magic-free books are what is usually called high fantasy, which is defined by a setting in an entirely imaginary world. It makes sense that not every imaginary world dreamt of by writers would involve magic or dragons. Nevertheless, if the world isn’t our own, it’s fantasy.
So why does this matter? From a librarian’s standpoint, it’s vital for readers’ advisory. It would be foolish to recommend a magic-heavy book to someone looking for readalikes to the Winner’s Curse, which has no magic at all. Most likely, people looking for more of the same want thoughtful worldbuilding, intense romance, and a minimal amount of strange words and concepts. So, why not just give them a bunch of historical fiction? Yes, these things could be achieved with historical fiction, but historical fiction doesn’t also provide a reading experience that sparks the imagination in quite the same way. Historical fiction is still limited by history. (It also has a harder time not spoiling the ending.)
Magic-free fantasy is a good entry point for readers who are just beginning to dip their toes into the genre. But beyond that, it’s important to recognize that yes, these stories are fantasy, because fantasy is awesome, in all meanings of the word. It’s hugely variable, has immense depth, and tells readers that you can literally find anything you can possibly imagine within the pages of a book. Including a completely new world without magic. (Denying that certain things are fantasy is also often done – however unintentionally – as a way to denigrate the genre as a whole. Think of someone saying, “Oh, I don’t read fantasy,” followed by the reply, “Well, it’s not really fantasy since there’s no magic.” The implications are there.)
Below are a few middle grade and YA fantasy titles without magic. They take place in imaginary worlds, fully-formed with complex cultures that you won’t find on Earth. Descriptions are from Worldcat. My own comments are in bracketed italics. Please comment with other titles you know of – even adult titles. I’m curious to see what others are out there.
The Winner’s Curse by Marie Rutkoski
An aristocratic girl who is a member of a warmongering and enslaving
empire purchases a slave, an act that sets in motion a rebellion that
might overthrow her world as well as her heart. [I read somewhere this is going to be a trilogy, but now I can’t remember where I found that piece of information.]
The False Prince by Jennifer A. Nielsen
a brutal competition to be selected to impersonate the king’s
long-missing son in an effort to avoid a civil war. [Book two: The Runaway King; Book three: The Shadow Throne.]
Jackaroo by Cynthia Voigt
When hard times among the People revive the old stories of the hero
Jackaroo, an innkeeper’s daughter follows her own quest to unlock the
secret reality behind the legend. [Voigt wrote three other books set in the same world, loosely connected to one another but set many years apart. Together, they’re called the Kingdom series. They include, in order, Jackaroo, On Fortune’s Wheel, The Wings of a Falcon, and Elske. I highly recommend them all, though my favorite is On Fortune’s Wheel.]
The Thief by Megan Whalen Turner
Gen flaunts his ingenuity as a thief and relishes the adventure which
takes him to a remote temple of the gods where he will attempt to steal a
precious stone. [This is the first in the Queen’s Thief series, which includes The Queen of Attolia, The King of Attolia, and A Conspiracy of Kings. It’s been many years since I’ve read these, but to the best of my memory, they contain no magic.]
Westmark by Lloyd Alexander
A boy fleeing from criminal charges falls in with a charlatan, his dwarf
attendant, and an urchin girl, travels with them about the kingdom of
Westmark, and ultimately arrives at the palace where the king is
grieving over the loss of his daughter. [These books are even more of a distant memory, but the Internet agrees with my recollection that they’re magic-free.]
Liviania says
I've always really enjoyed magic-free fantasy.
Amanda says
I agree with all you say about fantasies and what elements should classify a book as a fantasy. Fantasy is my favorite genre – fantasy with and without magical systems. Although I'm not sure I'd say that high fantasies never have any magic elements. I'd classify Lord of the Rings as a high fantasy and it does, sort of. And it certainly has magical creatures. The same with Shadow and Bone or Graceling. And A Game of Thrones.
Are you differentiating between magical systems and a religious system that is active and alive? Because I feel like it's fairly common in high fantasies to not only have a belief system in place, but one that actively interacts with the characters (certainly true for The Thief).
Other non-magical books: The Lies of Locke Lamora. Finnikin of the Rock (basically no magic).
This is such an interesting post! I quite enjoyed reading it. 🙂
admin says
Amanda, I did not mean to indicate that all high fantasies had no magic. Most of them do. What I wrote was actually "Most of these magic-free books are what is usually called high fantasy, which is defined by a setting in an entirely imaginary world. It makes sense that not every imaginary world dreamt of by writers would involve magic or dragons." So, high fantasy = completely new world, magic or no magic.
I don't feel like Finnikin is really nearly magic-free, since the curse is such a huge part of the story, and that's definitely magic.
admin says
You do bring up an interesting point about active gods/goddesses though. It's been too long since I read the Thief so I don't remember exactly the nature of the religion. Interesting to think about though.
Amanda says
Ah, I see now what you're saying about high fantasies. So magic-free books are generally high fantasies, but that doesn't mean they're the only type of high fantasies. I can see that being true.
I've been thinking about this, and once the belief system becomes about more than simply a basis for faith, I think it's fair to say there's a magical element at play. It's been a few years since I read The Girl of Fire and Thorns, but I don't think there was much magic at play – except for the magic related to Elisa bearing the Godstone and therefore the role of religion. And I remember thinking of that as containing some semblance of magic. I don't think everyone will think of interaction between gods/goddesses and the world as magical per se, but I think it can be a fair assessment to make.
Brian Sommers says
You mention when the world is not our own it is fantasy. What then separates science fiction with fantasy. I don't consider SF to be fantasy hence the different name that we call it. I'm very curious as to what the difference here is?
admin says
We talk about that in our SF genre guide here: http://www.stackedbooks.org/2013/02/get-genrefied-science-fiction.html
Basically, SF is plausible. It could happen. (Even if it's pretty far-fetched.) These worlds in fantasy without magic plain don't exist, so they're not plausible.
admin says
And by "don't exist," I mean that they couldn't exist, in our galaxy or another. In a lot of SF, writers create worlds that don't exist, but the premise is that they could – either in our own galaxy or another.
Brian Sommers says
Thanks for the link, reading now.
I started this thread and it's interesting as well:
http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?p=9223982#post9223982
Sam says
Is there such a genre as deviated history fantasy, where fictional periods are portrayed in a non-fictional light with non-fictional storys and endings?
Aisling says
I found a list on Goodreads.com
Can’t say anything about these books personally.
https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/fantasy-without-magic
David says
Rangers Apprentice by John flanagan. Superstition, but no magic.
Ben Livingstone says
One was just published last year–“Arlinga: Concerning a man”, by Roan Clay. It’s high fantasy, set in another world, without magic at all.
http://www.roanclay.com/bookstore.html