• STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

STACKED

books

  • STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

Butter by Erin Jade Lange

September 18, 2012 |

No one would deny that Butter is fat.

He wouldn’t argue against it either. Butter knows. He knows, too, that he’s an outcast at his school and even with his parents because of that not-so-little number on the scale. It’s impossible to be ignored when you’re the biggest kid in school, but being fat makes Butter invisible anyway.

Over the last year, though, Butter has developed a strong relationship with Anna, who is one of the most popular girls at school. Except, she doesn’t know it’s Butter with whom she’s developed this friendship/near romance. Their relationship is all online, and Butter goes by a nickname on the internet so Anna has no idea with whom she’s really communicating. It’s through the protection of the computer that Butter feels comfortable being himself and opening himself up to her. He has nothing to hide. At least emotionally.

After a series of events that prove to Butter how little he is to the rest of the student body — including Anna — he decides he’s going to make a change. See, it’s been hard for Butter to fit in and gain acceptance not just because of his size, but because of how he reacted around a group of popular boys in the past who taunted him because of his size. In hopes of retaliation and in hopes of fitting in, he’s going to eat himself to death online for everybody to watch.

But as the day draws closer to when he’s to perform his act, everyone wants to know if Butter will really go through with it or not. That’s when the real question emerges: what will killing himself prove, if anything? And will it get him the sort of acceptance he wants in those final days or will he be simply making himself a bigger target of torment than he already is? Will it make Anna accept him as Butter or will she continue pretending he isn’t the guy she talks to online?

Erin Jade Lange’s debut Butter is one of the best explorations of weight in YA I have ever read. Everything Butter experiences is painful, and he is completely aware of his own problem. Neither the character nor the story exploit the weight issue to make it a Weight Issue; rather, we’re allowed to experience humiliation and frustration right along with the main character, and we’re forced to see why he chooses to behave in the manner he does. This doesn’t excuse it nor does it make it more acceptable — the entire concept of live casting your death by eating in excess for audience viewing is horrific — but as readers, we understand the desperation Butter feels in wanting to be accepted for who he is. A fat kid. There aren’t cut and dry answers about what weight should or shouldn’t be in this story. Rather, we’re offered a character who is fat, and that physical attribute of him has become Who He Is, rather than any of his personality or heart.

The bigger issue undercutting all of the book is that of bullying, including online bullying. Although the bulk of Butter’s school experience has been one of mostly being ignored, that wasn’t always the case. When he stands up for himself and chooses he to go public with his eating-to-death plan, he’s suddenly finding himself gaining attention of the popular crowd. But it’s not necessarily because they want to befriend Butter. Rather, they’re subtly bullying him by forcing him outside of his comfort zone in a threatening, rather than supportive and encouraging, manner. They’re using Butter’s fearlessness toward death as their opportunity to get one last jab in at him, even if he’s not entirely aware that is the case. Then there’s Anna: despite learning the truth about the boy for whom she has fallen hard, she refuses to accept Butter as himself. She’s angry that he lied to her and pretended to be someone who he wasn’t.

Of course, he wasn’t doing that. At least, he doesn’t think that’s what he was doing.

What makes Butter stand out is that there are absolutely no clear cut good and bad sides in the story. While we’re sympathetic toward Butter and Anna, as well as even the popular boys and Butter’s former best friend Tucker, we can’t make solid decisions on whether they’re necessarily good characters or not. It’s also unclear whether or not they’re likable — as much as I wanted to like Butter, I found myself feeling much more sympathy for him that feeling like he was likable. But that doesn’t mean he was entirely unlikeable, either. Lang has created characters who fall into both categories and who make choices that fall into both categories, too. In doing so, the pacing of the story holds up, as does the tension. It’s never clear how things will play out because it’s never clear whether characters have the guts to go through with their plans. This has a great tempering of emotional highs with emotional lows. And of course it gets to the heart of the story, which is that no one is wholly who they act like and no one can ever truly know the whole of who we are. We all only share so much.

The knockout aspect of Butter was the voice — Lang nails it with Butter, and she’s not only able to successfully give us a great male narrator, but she does so without coming across as too emotional, despite the meaty topics at hand. Butter’s voice reminded me quite a bit of Jace’s voice in Swati Avasthi’s Split and even though they tackle different topics, this would make an excellent read alike to Avasthi’s book. Likewise, I think this book would have appeal to those who read and loved Simmone Howell’s Everything Beautiful or maybe even KL Going’s Fat Kid Rules the World. This book also reminded me quite a bit of KM Walton’s debut Cracked. Butter’s voice and experiences are going to resonate with many readers who themselves feel like outcasts or like they’re forgotten because of something out of their control. Likewise, the issue of bullying is timely and in particular, online bullying and the notion of online life and reputation are relevant and pertinent. While this book isn’t necessarily funny, Butter’s voice is thoughtful and the tough topics are handled in a way that won’t necessarily leave readers uncomfortable (though it will at times make them feel that way, it is not overwhelming or destructive to the narrative or the characters).

As much as I thought the characters in the story were well-developed and that the pacing and tension were on, I felt like the book became a bit message-y and heavy-handed at times and particularly at the end. It’s not cool to make fun of someone for their physical appearance, and it’s not cool to be a bully. It’s also not cool to pretend to be who you aren’t, and it’s not okay to give up everything when you have an opportunity to change it. I felt like some of those message-y aspects could have been pulled back a tiny bit because Butter’s voice and the story he lives through would make those things stand much stronger on their own. These didn’t ruin his voice or the story itself, but they didn’t allow them to shine with the intensity that they could have.

Lang’s writing in the book is great, and I am eager to see where she takes her sophomore novel — a book which will also tackle the issue of bullying. Butter is available today.

Review copy received from the publisher.

Filed Under: Reviews, Uncategorized, Young Adult

Cybils 2012

September 17, 2012 |

I’m thrilled to be a Round Two judge in the Graphic Novels category of this year’s Cybils awards. Last year, I judged round two in the Young Adult SFF category, so I’m excited to be trying something new this year. I hope to be exposed to more great graphic novels, more great blogs and bloggers, and more great literary discussion!

While I’m excited to be a part of the Cybils again, I also want to make sure that the books I end up judging are worthy. What I’m getting at is I want YOU to nominate good books for me to read! Submissions open October 1, and I sincerely hope you will ensure that no good title is left out.

Filed Under: cybils, Uncategorized

Weight, Body Image & Body Portrayal in YA Books

September 17, 2012 |

This week, I’m reviewing a few books that tackle a subject that’s near and dear to my heart. I thought before delving into those reviews, I’d talk about why these books are tough for me to read and even harder for me to review without bias. I think it’s fair to say that when I review a book — when anyone reviews a book — there are certain biases that emerge within the review. Certain subjects tend to arouse more feelings or beliefs than others. It would be impossible to be entirely objective in a review. You can get close, but even if you evaluate a book solely on a list of literary standards, your own biases about what makes a standard come into play.

My touchy subjects are weight and body image. More specifically, the portrayal of characters who aren’t thin or of average, non-noteworthy size. In other words, I’m endlessly curious about stories featuring fat or obese characters. If you’ve spent any time here you know this already, as I’ve talked about fat girls on book covers and I talked about how annoying it is that bodies are constantly compared to one another in such a way that even thin bodies are somehow improper or less-than worthy of being a body.

I’m inherently biased against books featuring fat characters because being fat has been a reality of my life since middle school and through high school, college, graduate school, now. Living with a fat body has been my reality. It’s been my reality and my existence for as long as I can remember being body-aware.

Everyone’s experience with their own physical body is different. Everyone’s bodies are as they are for entirely different reasons, and everyone’s level of acceptance of what they look like and how they feel is going to be different. It changes, too: I thought I was huge in high school, thanks in part to what other people would say to me. But when I got to college, I realized I wasn’t that big. Until, of course, I gained a lot of weight in college. I’m talking close to 100 pounds over the course of four years — and why doesn’t really matter. The thing is, I didn’t feel all that different than I did in high school. I was able to do everything I did in high school physically. I still got out of bed. I could still do the stairs. I could still participate in x, y, and z and not feel like my body was holding me back. Was I happy with how I looked? No. But I was still physically capable of doing everything I wanted to do.

What left a mark on me was less about my fat and more about what other people thought about fat and then attached to me.  There are a million assumptions about fat people, about how their bodies hold them back and how their bodies are somehow less-than because they are larger. About how because they carry more fat, then they’re a part of the problem of the obesity epidemic, of health crises, and so on. About how they’re somehow less human because their bodies take up more space. But in my experience, none of these things are true. I’m still as perfectly a valid human as someone who is half or quarter of my size and as perfectly valid as someone who might be three or four or eight times the size of me. Even after shedding a lot of weight and taking better care of myself physically in terms of following a fitness and eating routine, I still consider who I was at my highest weight as essential and important a human as I am now — and if you’re wondering, since likely you are because I think it’s part of the human/societal condition at this point to be so, I’m at the smallest I have been since high school right now, even though I probably weigh more than anyone would believe.

Of course, this is to say that what the scale says means nothing except whatever you believe it says. Do I still find myself excited when I see the number go down? Absolutely. But what matters most to me is how I feel when I get up in the morning and how I’m able to best navigate my world within the body I have. The fat but still absolutely human body.

When I read a book tackling weight then, I bring my own life experience to the table. I bring all the baggage I’ve dealt with and all of my experiences living with my body and the experiences of others living with my body. Is it fair? Maybe, maybe not. But often, books tackling overweight teens tend to fall into a number of problematic tropes and stereotypes:

  • Attachment to eating: In so many of the books tackling weight issues — and I’ll say this about both books about overweight teens and books about teens struggling with eating disorders on the other side of the spectrum — is that food and consumption are inextricably linked to emotion and comfort. Does this happen in real life? Absolutely. We go out and eat to celebrate good news, and sometimes we dive into certain foods for comfort when we’re sad or depressed or anxious. But what many of these books do is continuously attach meaning to eating. The fat character can’t cope with loss or grief or any other big deal issue, their only solution is to eat. There’s not an actual, genuine emotion to ground the reader to the character or to allow the reader to empathize with the character and their situation. Instead, readers are told that the character is just eating again to make themselves feel better about whatever the issue at hand is. The association is that the character is weak and that their bodies are fat because they’re too weak to tackle the issue at hand. They turn to comfort, and then they wear that comfort through their fatness. This feels like cheating to me — it’s too simplistic and far too dehumanizing in terms of explaining why someone is fat. It’s lazy character development and relies upon societal stereotypes of what does and doesn’t make someone fat. Readers are given the explanation they’re given everywhere else, furthering the stereotype and further suggesting the connection between a problem and a fat body. 
  • Choice vs. legitimate issue: Many times, the fat character is fat because, well, she or he chose to be that way. The food for comfort issue above plays into it a bit, but more than that, stories about the fat character tend to make the reader assume that said character could be different — could be thin or of an average size — if they were better/smarter/less lazy/any other quality that is within their own control. In other words, it’s their own fault they’re fat so suck it up and deal. That’s far too simplistic and again, it’s exactly what society says about fat people, isn’t it? That change is entirely within their control and the only reason they aren’t slim is because they’re lazy? The truth is, though, fat people are fat for any number of reasons: genetics, health concerns, and their environment, among other things. Sometimes, very active, athletic people are fat. Sometimes, they’re more fit than thin people, too. Fat isn’t always about choice. Even if there is choice involved in how one’s body appears, making a commitment to change, to start working out or eating “right” or any number of other choices meant to make a fat body less fat doesn’t promise the end of fat. That we continue to suggest it’s a choice is harmful and ignorant.
  • Changing for someone/something else: I don’t think it’s unreasonable or unbelievable that sometimes what spurs a person to change their life is someone or something else. Especially teens. Peer pressure and the desire to fit in are cornerstones of teen development. And here is where my adult sensibilities kick in — it is problematic to me when weight loss, when getting rid of fatness, is the means for a character to suddenly become accepted. When fatness is portrayed as the stumbling block in making a character one worthy of being accepted, of being loved, of capturing the attention of the cute boy or the popular clique. Does it happen in real life? I’d be naive to say no; I also think I’d be naive in suggesting that a book tackling fat issues make itself a happy story where everyone learns to accept one another in whatever shape or size they are. Here’s the thing though. At what point are these books simply playing upon social expectations? It’s the Cinderella scenario. As soon as the fat character overcomes their fatness and becomes what society wants them to be — thin and attractive — they’re suddenly going to be accepted and loved. Fat is bad. It’s ugly. And often in these books, it is the only reason someone can’t get the stud or fit in with a certain crowd. Here’s the truth: the only way you can change and sustain change is through making the commitment to yourself. You have to first accept who you are at that very basic level before you can decide to change. Choosing to change to fit other people’s molds isn’t just unhealthy; it’s unrealistic. In real life, when you lose a significant part of your fatness, it doesn’t make people like you more. It doesn’t get you the star football player. And if it DOES do those things, then that says more about those people than it does about you. So that many of these books showcase weight loss as a means to solve your social problems is in and of itself troubling. 
  • Lack of support: Going along with the changing for other people issue is that in so many of these books, fat characters lack support systems. Even their families lack empathy for their fat compatriots. Mom or dad or brother or sister constantly nag upon the fat character to get on a diet, to lose weight, to make themselves better. Often the characters are portrayed as loners or as people who don’t have many friends to whom they can turn. Or if they do have friends, those friends are either struggling with fatness themselves or aren’t true friends. They’re of the hot and cold variety. It’s never about who the person is on the inside. It’s about what they look like on the outside. Even if it’s explained as coming from a place of concern and love on the part of the family member of friend, it’s still troubling that these fat characters aren’t accepted wholly for who they are until they lose weight.  
  • Fat fear stereotyping: This one’s mileage varies, so understand this is entirely my personal peeve, though I am probably not isolated in this feeling. Many times books tackling fat characters play into horrific stereotypes of what it means to exist in a fat body. What that experience must be like. For starters — and this particular scenario emerges repeatedly in these books — there’s the character’s fear of not fitting into a seat or of a chair breaking beneath them. Is this a legitimate concern? I think so. Except, it’s also not a part of one’s existence with a fat body at every waking moment. If it were, fat people wouldn’t leave their homes. Wouldn’t go to school. Wouldn’t get on an airplane (where fat people are regularly discriminated against anyway). In other words, a lot of times these books look into the experience of fat with speculation and almost a perverse sense of power in terms of a character’s capabilities or lack thereof. These characters live a daily life of fear, to the point it can paralyze them. Fatness is to be feared because by being fat, you might embarrass yourself if you try to sit on the locker room bench. Or in the classroom chair. Or hell, that a fat body can’t participate in physical education class because there’s no way someone who weighs 300 pounds could ever get through 30 minutes of activity. 
  • Non-acceptance of self: The most troubling issue for me in these books, though, is that a character who is fat rarely gets the opportunity to accept themselves as they are. Because of all the issues outlined above, they’re already pinned down AS the fat character and AS the fat character, they’re somehow less-than-human. They lack feelings, they lack drive and ambition for non-body related goals, they lack friends and family, and they lack self-care. If adolescence is about growing up and learning about yourself, who you are, and what you’re capable of, that should translate into your physical experience, too. I mean, it already does with puberty. I don’t quite understand then why these books insist that being fat isn’t okay. That it’s something needing to be changed. I think it goes back to what I’ve repeated over and over: social norms. Social beliefs about what it means to have and live inside a fat body. Because a fat body is somehow less able to do the things a normal or thin body is. Because a fat body represents what’s wrong with everything in society. Because a fat body represents something to someone who isn’t existing within the body that they are judging. 

I feel like we’ve come leaps and bounds in terms of accepting people in our world for their lifestyle choices. By no way are we perfect nor do I think we will ever be, but we are far more willing to look at people who are LGBTQ or who are choosing non-traditional means of careers or education or who have maybe become pregnant at a bad time and need to make life-altering choices impacting themselves and that child and accept the choices they make. These are, of course, a small number of examples. But when it comes to choosing to accept fatness, we continue to drown in these stereotypes. I can count on one hand the books that work against one or all of the problems above, and that makes me sad and frustrated. Aside from being that teen — and now being that adult — I know scads of kids who are exposed to these beliefs and it damages them early on. It tells them they’ll never be good enough. It tells them that their bodies are wrong, are disgusting, are less than capable and that translates into them thinking they aren’t worthy of love or acceptance, either.

We’re much more than our bodies, but we exist within a physical shape for our entire lives. We can choose to accept them or we can choose to change them, but that choice is entirely personal. It’s disheartening when stories of triumph and of change are instead muddied with simplistic renderings of what it means to be a person.

So over the next few days, I’ve scheduled reviews of a few books touching on what it is like to be a fat kid. Some are better than others and some DO absolutely force a character to change — for themselves. What I’ve been trying to point out is that sometimes the story is just that, about a fat character who needs or wants to change themselves. But too often, it comes at the price of falling into easy-to-use stereotypes, easy-to-buy scenarios that devalue the character and their journey to that point. Because even if their fatness is the point of the story, they are so much more than what their bodies look like. 

If you’ve read a book where you think an overweight character has been particularly well rendered, I’d love to hear the title. I’ve got a small list, and I’ve read a handful, but I feel this is an area worth shining more light into. We offer books about the dangers and truths of eating disorders. Why is it we can’t offer that sort of array of fiction to those who are fat without falling into a problematic trope? 

(I’m not the only person thinking about this lately. Funny enough, this is a post I’ve been working on for a month or so now, and in that space, this is a topic that popped up over at Teen Librarian’s Toolbox, and it’s well worth reading. Please also read the fantastic blog post by Rae Carson about weight and what it means to have extra weight as a woman. It’s one of those pieces I return to again and again.) 

Filed Under: big issues, fatness, Uncategorized

Being authentic

September 16, 2012 |

I’ve been mulling over Janssen’s blog post all week. If you haven’t already, please go read it.

What she talks about is something I think about a lot and something I think relates to blogging, as well as something that relates to reading and reacting to books. I’ve talked at length about how challenging it can be to blog, and how challenging it can be to review books. But what it all comes down to, I think, is that little word: authenticity. Blogging and thinking about reading are challenging because they require you to be authentic in how you approach what you’re thinking about and in how you say what you hope to say.

When your blog is your voice and that — in conjunction with Twitter and other social media — is how people get to know who you are and determine whether or not they care about your thoughts and how you present them, authenticity is all you have to bring to the table.

I think there is tremendous pressure to always be “on.” I remember even talking about one of the tips to being successful (however you measure that) with blogging is by always being on, even when you’re not on. Many bloggers I know and respect are just this way. Because what you’re passionate about is what you write about, you keep your eyes and ears aware of whatever’s going on, even if you’re not working on something. Because finding fodder can happen by chance. I find a lot of times my best thinking comes in those moments where I accidentally stumble upon something interesting or worth discussing, rather than when I seek it out (especially when it comes to things like writing book reviews for a blog tour). This is a big reason why I say no to a lot of opportunities that come — unless I’ve already read the book or am eager to read it, the chances of me finding a lot of fulfillment in meeting a review deadline are slim. It’s not the book’s fault. It’s not the blog’s fault. And it’s not my fault either. It’s just a matter of being authentic and true to what it is I want from my work blogging and reading.

As April pointed out and I keep returning back to, blogging isn’t a competition. We’re all doing our own things here. Just because another blogger has found success tackling one topic, that doesn’t mean I can’t tackle a similar topic here with my own spin. And vice versa. Likewise, I have no reason to worry about how many reviews I write and post per week or month. I blog the way I want to blog because that is being authentic. It’s being true and honest about myself and what I think, as well as how I want to express my thoughts on anything. Sometimes I read a slew of books in a row that don’t speak to me enough to merit a lengthy blog post or even a short blog post. Sometimes I purposely dig to find those books which aren’t getting much attention, both new and older books, in hopes of being able to talk them up a little bit.

Sometimes what I want to write about cuts across into deeper issues or things I’m thinking about. Things that as I write them, I find myself feeling incredibly vulnerable for putting it down and then putting it out there. What scares me is far less what the words say (because I wouldn’t write them if I weren’t being true and honest) but more about what the perception is thereafter. I don’t particularly worry about what people think of me as a person because I’ve reached a point in my life where if people don’t want to like me, so be it. But I do worry about what the perception is in those situations where people are interacting with me in another forum. Am I the same person elsewhere that I am here when I blog? Or when I find myself in a heated discussion on Twitter?

Absolutely.

The only time I ever feel I’m not being myself is when I’m not being honest. Or when I’m not finding myself worrying and stressing out about little things like this. Where I’m not biting my nails about a blog post I have scheduled for this week that puts a lot of stuff out there about which I’m still working through intellectually myself.

This blog is my work. I make it that way because I love it being that way. But like any work, it comes with baggage, too. There’s a responsibility in knowing when I’m being authentic and when I’m not, and there’s a responsibility in knowing that some things will be worthwhile and others won’t be. There’s ups and downs, regrets and disappointments, and there’s plenty of good things, tangible and not. Even when it’s lonely work, there’s a community to call upon and one which totally gets what you’re going through. Maybe it’s just me, but it feels like the blogging world has been down lately. That there’s been a lot of feeling down and pressured and overwhelmed. That we’re all feeling a bit of a slump with reading, with writing, with sharing.

Because it is hard to be on all the time. Because it is impossible to be on all the time and be true to who you are and what you are getting out of this.

Authenticity is stepping back, evaluating where you are and what it is you’re pressuring yourself with, and making choices about how to proceed from there. And honestly? I’m having a hell of a time with it lately. I am exceedingly happy with what this blog is and what it is to me, but there are so many times I worry about whether it’s good enough, whether I’m doing enough or whether I’m doing too much or whether it’s becoming noise. It goes both ways. I worry about when I’m putting too much out there and when I’m not giving enough context. Because I want it clear where my thinking is and where it comes from. I want it clear what it is I am bringing myself.

I’m not the kind of person who feels in competition with others. I feel immense competition with myself. It’s one of those things I constantly wish I could push through — if I could let myself be off for a bit, would I feel better? If I quit worrying about whether I was being at my best all the time, would I feel better? If I chose to blog less during the week, would I drive myself crazy because I’m not producing as much? Or would I feel better because I’m letting myself have space? At what point would I be making things better or worse for myself?

I am the only person who has the ability to answer these questions. But figuring out the answers is tough because nothing is right and nothing is wrong. It is only what it is to me. 

Filed Under: blogging, Uncategorized

The Wicked and the Just by J. Anderson Coats

September 14, 2012 |

I wasn’t really sure what to expect going in to The Wicked and the Just, J. Anderson Coats’ debut novel. It’s a historical novel about a period of history I know almost nothing about: British-occupied Wales in the late 13th century. 
Teenage Cecily is dragged to Wales by her father, and she’s sure her life is ruined. She sees the Welsh as barbaric and she’d much rather be lady of the house at Edgeley Hall, the estate that has been denied her father in favor of his older brother. Still, she’s pleased that she’ll have a domain to rule over, which includes bossing around the Welsh servant Gwenhwyfar and her brother.
Gwenhwyfar was intended to be the lady of the house before the British occupied Wales, and she is not happy about her current position. Portions of the book follow her story, and her narrative is bleak and desperate and angry. She and her brother are very poor, victims of the corrupt local British government (not to mention Cecily). They’re at the mercy of Cecily and her father, who are both deliberately and casually cruel on a consistent basis. 
Both girls’ stories show just how hard, dirty, and bug-ridden life in the Middle Ages was. Even Cecily and her father, who belong in the upper class, share a room divided by a sheet, and Cecily’s days are full of work. This makes Gwenhwyfar’s life seem all the more bleak by contrast.
The Wicked and the Just is mostly a character study of these two young women. Cecily is the primary narrator, and the story mostly belongs to her. She is a maddening character. She’s mostly awful – spoiled, bratty, often cruel. (And I mean truly, truly cruel.) As the story is told in her words, though, we develop an understanding and, later on, sympathy for her. While she may not end the book an angel, there’s a definite character arc, and she exhibits growth. 
Gwenhwyfar’s story gains greater importance later on, when the simmering tensions in the town boil over into violence. Now she has the opportunity to visit justice upon the wicked, but her actions are not obvious or easy to predict. The relationship between the two girls is complicated with many ups and downs. Just as you think the two have developed some sort of bond, someone (usually Cecily) does something to sever it.
I want to emphasize that this story is not a case of “mean girl sees the light thanks to the wisdom of the people she bullies.” That’s far too simple an explanation, and it doesn’t take into consideration the insurmountable barrier of class. But Cecily does change, and Gwenhwyfar is a major agent of that change. Coats ties this together nicely in her author’s note, explaining that the relationships between people like Cecily and Gwenhwyfar helped turn the tide of violence and corruption in Wales that flourished at this time.
This story is definitely very different from what’s hot right now. It also doesn’t bear much resemblance to the historical fiction I read and loved as a teenager – I wanted love stories and happy endings and a rosier view of the past than was really realistic. And The Wicked and the Just starts off seeming that way – Cecily’s first few sentences are dead ringers for Birdy in Karen Cushman’s Catherine Called Birdy. But it quickly changes into something much darker, dirtier, and more violent. This makes it more realistic, and it also means it’s a perfect fit for history buffs and readers who crave knowledge about time periods that are not their own. Moreover, the historical details are fascinating and the writing is excellent.
J. Anderson Coats is a member of the Class of 2K12, which means she stopped by STACKED for a guest post and twitterview earlier in the year.
Review copy received from the publisher. The Wicked and the Just is available now.

Filed Under: Historical Fiction, Reviews, Uncategorized, Young Adult

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 190
  • 191
  • 192
  • 193
  • 194
  • …
  • 404
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Search

Archives

We dig the CYBILS

STACKED has participated in the annual CYBILS awards since 2009. Click the image to learn more.

© Copyright 2015 STACKED · All Rights Reserved · Site Designed by Designer Blogs