STACKED

books

“Best of YA” Lists By the Numbers: 2011 – 2014 Stats, Comparisons, and Thoughts

|

In 2011, I started keeping track of the YA books that made the “best of” lists across the professional publications, which include Kirkus, Horn Book, School Library Journal, Publishers Weekly, and in instances where it’s happened, Library Journal. My methods of data collection have varied a little each year, as sometimes I’ve been more interested in one element than another or it’s a matter of time, energy, and having read or having had access to titles to verify what they do or do not include.

Since there’s now been four years of data, I thought it would be worthwhile to look at the similarities and differences as seen through these lists. This will be an imperfect post with imperfect data; it wasn’t until the last couple of years I better understood what I was looking at and how to look at it. That means some of the data might be lacking in some years and it might be inaccurate in others. That doesn’t change what’s worth thinking about, though.

All of the data comes from the following posts:

Because the journals have selected varying numbers of titles for their lists, haven’t selected any titles for their lists, and because my own counting has changed over the years, the number of eligible titles in each data set is different. That doesn’t make a huge change, though, when it comes to comparisons by percentages. Most years, between 55 and 90 titles are on these lists. Not all of the categories I’m going to hit in this comparison will have all four years featured; that has been noted where appropriate.
Let’s dig in.
Gender and “Best of” Lists

Have more female authors always been on the “best of” lists? Has there been any sort of change over the last four years? 
In 2011, the gender breakdown was 58% women and 42% men. 
In 2012, 80% of the authors on the “best of” lists were women and 20% were men. 
In 2013, the breakdown was roughly 75% women and 25% men.
In 2014, the break down was roughly 70% female authors and 30% male authors.
Each of the four years, women had more books on the “best of” lists than men did. This is decidedly different than the New York Times Bestsellers list, which is dominated by male authors. On average, 70% of the “best of” authors are women and 30% are men. 
There doesn’t appear to be any trend here in terms of whether male or female authors are earning more or fewer spots each year. 
When it comes to the gender of main characters, comparison is a little tricky, since I haven’t been consistent about keeping track of that. I covered it in 2013 for the first time, but I didn’t create a catch all category of “cast of characters” until this year. So this data is imperfect by nature, but I’m going to share it, since it’s interesting nonetheless. 
In 2013, the split of female and male main characters in YA fiction was almost 50/50. Female voices came ahead only slightly, with 53% of the titles. For a year when there were far more female authors than there were male authors, it can’t be said male voices were underrepresented in the books at all.
2014 had more female voices than male voices represented, but with the cast of characters as a third factor, the representation isn’t hugely different. Again, despite having more female authors on the “best of” lists, the difference in male voices in the books against female voices in the books remains not hugely different. There are plenty of books featuring male main characters and they’re earning recognition. 
Debut Authors and “Best of” Lists

As more people talk about and seek out debut authors, has that impacted the “best of” lists at all? Are we seeing more now than we did in 2011 or are we seeing about the same number? This particular factor interests me as it relates to the Morris award and when the finalists are announced. I haven’t kept record of that from prior to this year, so I can’t make a call on how it may or may not influence picks on these lists.
In 2011, roughly 25% of the books on “best of” lists were by debut authors, while 75% were by authors who’d been previously published.
The numbers changed a little bit in 2012, as 20% of the authors were debuts and 80% were more seasoned authors.
The percentages were unchanged in 2013, with 20% of authors being debut and 80% being previously published.
2014 featured the biggest percentage of debut authors, at almost 29%, with previously published authors filling 71% of the “best of” list slots.
The data shows there’s never been fewer than 20% of “best of” picks going to debut authors. This seems like a really positive percentage and shows how professionals picking these lists aren’t sticking entirely to those voices that are familiar to them. I think that sort of recognition — one that happens with Morris titles, too — helps these books find new readers and helps grow excitement for those debut authors’ sophomore efforts. 
“Best of” Books By Genre

Genre is touch to figure out every year. Some books could go one way or another way, and some books cross genres and blur the lines between them. In fact, something I’ve noticed about many of the “best of” titles over the years is that many of them seem to find themselves on these lists for that very reason — they are doing unique things with genre, making them stand out as memorable. 
But have there been any trends over the last four years? Is there one kind of book doing more strongly than others? Are there genres which don’t seem to appear as many times as others on these lists?
The first stab I took at genre was in 2011, wherein for some reason I thought it was valuable to separate thrillers from mysteries. There weren’t as many genre-braided titles in this year, though as it shows, contemporary/realistic titles had the most representation, followed closely by fantasy, historical fiction, and then mysteries/thrillers, and science fiction. 
The 2012 breakdown looks a little different than 2011, wherein fantasy titles outranked realistic, followed by historical, science fiction, then mysteries/thrillers. There was a noted drop in historical fiction here from the previous year. 
In 2013, I discovered how much easier this data is to look at in bar form than in pie form. Realistic fiction took the top spots this year, followed by historical fiction, then fantasy. If fantasy and paranormal were folded together, it’s likely it would be even with historical, if not slightly more. 
Even when the subgenres of fantasy were collapsed, realistic fiction still held the most “best of” spots in 2014. Fantasy wasn’t far behind. But most interesting is that historical fiction is nearly non-existent in 2014 on the lists — more books were historical fantasy than actual historical fiction. This year also ushered in more titles that were magical realism, as that was a subgenre/blending of genres not seen in previous years. 
Maybe the most interesting thing about this data is how science fiction hasn’t been a leading genre in the “best of” lists. In fact, it’s fallen a bit — are we not seeing science fiction among the “best” anymore? Has there been a drop in the number of science fiction titles being published? Are science fiction books more likely part of a series and thus not always easy to put on “best” lists? There are more questions than answers, but I want to know more about what’s happening with science fiction in YA. 
Also worth noting: despite the fact everyone considered this to be THE year for contemporary/realistic fiction, it’s not really doing better than in previous years. This is a statement I’ve made since the start, and I’ll stick with it: contemporary/realistic fiction isn’t a trend. It’s a staple, and it’s always been there and always been stable. Even if a couple of big names have made it more prominent in bookstores and in getting marketing/publicity money, the trend isn’t changing how well-respected and regarded it is. People have been reading it and people will continue reading it. 
Diversity and the “Best of” Lists

So…have we been seeing more people of color and more LGBTQ representation on the “best of” lists in the last four years? 
My data on this has been presented a few ways, depending on what information I could find about books or authors in a given year. I haven’t made any of this data visual in the past, so I’m going to continue in that trend:
  • In 2011, 8 books were primarily about or featured a main character of color. 2 featured main characters who identified as LGBTQ. I did not count authors in this year, citing that finding the information was too difficult, and I believe this — people have been identifying more in the last couple of years, making that information more public and accessible. 
  • In 2012, there were 89 books and 90 authors represented in the data. I collapsed representation of people of color this year, meaning the count included both the authors who identified and he books that featured a main character of color. There were 20 titles/authors that fit.  A total of 6 books featured LGBTQ main characters or story lines. 
  • In 2013, I kept the author/character counts separate for people of color, and I found that 8 of the authors were people of color, and 10 of the books featured main characters of color, for a total of 18. There were 55 authors and 62 main characters. A total of 5 books by my count featured main characters who identified as LGBTQ, though as noted in the comments, I didn’t include The Dream Thieves, so there are actually 6. 
  • In 2014, there were 14 main characters/authors that I identified as people of color and a total of 6 books that featured LGBTQ main characters or story lines. 

It’s really tough to tell whether or not things are improving or not. Sure, there are more people of color and more LGBTQ stories represented in the last year than in the first year, but it’s still a very small percentage. As I noted yesterday, only 2 books featured stories where the main character identified as LGBTQ and a person of color. I think it’s about damn time we saw more of these stories and about time we saw more of these stories being recognized. 
What can be said, though, is these numbers are still tiny. 
Final Data and Thoughts


There’s not a lot else to dig into when comparing the data that’s particularly useful — I note every year that Candlewick seems to have a good number of titles on “best of” lists for a publisher as small as they are, and I also note every year that books published as hardcovers have a markedly better time of being recognized as “best of” titles than paperback originals or split run titles. Books published in April, May, September, and October have better chances of landing on lists than those published in November, December, January, July, and August. 

Journals have been changing their number of titles selected each year, and that’s been interesting to see. A few years ago, Kirkus selected 100 titles; this year, they selected 50. Not all of them ended up in my count, since they included fiction and non-fiction, but Kirkus still has the largest number of titles on the list, and the titles Kirkus selects more often only end up on the Kirkus list, as opposed to showing up on numerous lists.

Another worthy element to consider, which I haven’t here but could if I were to dig up all of my original spreadsheets, is whether there are authors who are perennial favorites. I have a suspicion, for example, that Maggie Stiefvater and A. S. King are two authors who have appeared every year on these lists (in fact, I know that they have!). Anyone who is up for the challenge of ferreting that out is more than welcome to do so, and I’d be happy to include that work in a link round-up feature here.

So, with all of this data now here, what’s surprising? Is there anything worth thinking about or any conclusions worth drawing? What sort of picture does this paint about what is considered the best in any given year? What is going on in science fiction?

I’d love to hear thoughts and ideas about this, or anything else noteworthy in the “best of” lists, as there’s now a four-year look at data.

“Best of 2014” in YA Fiction List Break Down

|

Every year, I like to dive into the “best of” lists and look at the similarities and differences between and among the lists. More, I think it’s worthwhile to dig into what the books that comprise these lists do or don’t have within them — how diverse are they, how are they representing sexuality, what sort of gender make up are the characters and authors, and so forth. Because the “best of” lists offer a glimpse into the year of reading for YA, this is an interesting and worthwhile way to see what is and isn’t happening.

This is the fourth year I’ve done this, and previous data sets can be found here, here, and here. I do plan on looking through them all and comparing across years, since I am curious whether things are looking any differently now in 2014 than they were in 2011. Look for that in the next week or so.

To look at the numbers, I broke apart the “best of” YA lists from the following professional publications: Kirkus, Horn Book, School Library Journal, and Publishers Weekly. In previous years, I also used Library Journal’s lists — first a “Best YA” list, then a “Best YA for Adult Readers” list — but they didn’t have one this year. From those lists, I pulled out only the YA fiction, meaning that they were titles designated for those readers 12-18. I did not include graphic memoirs, though I did include graphic novels when they were fiction. In the past I’ve eliminated graphic novels, but this year there were only two, so I kept them. This led to a total of 55 titles being tallied in the data. There were 59 authors considered here, as well. I included translators and illustrators in the author category because their work is as important and worth considering. When I get into the charts and designations, there will be further notes about this, as I could not track down information I’d hoped to and had to leave it out in some places.

Using my own knowledge from reading the books or reviews, I determined whether books featured a main character or main arc that included LGBTQ themes. I double-checked that data with Malinda Lo, who will be posting her 2014 round-up of the year in LGBTQ YA this week. I also looked at whether main characters were people of color or an author was a person of color, as determined through my own reading, reviews, and/or easily researched information. I did have to ask about a couple books and authors, and that information was verified for me. In addition to these analytical pieces, I’ve made notes in my data where other elements of diversity were part of a story; this includes mental illness, disabilities, minor roles for characters of color, and so forth. I did not tabulate this data, but it is all available to look at in my giant spreadsheet. Because writing out titles would make this post very, very long, I encourage having that open while looking at the data, as it’ll make referencing which books were counted where easier.

All information about starred reviews came through Jen J’s exceptionally well-done spreadsheet. There is one note to make about this, which is that I also went through Horn Book’s January/February starred reviews to be completist about it, which led to one title on this list having an additional star yet to be noted on her spreadsheet.

As always, caveats: none of this data means anything. I’ve not tried to draw conclusions or suggest certain things about the books that popped up on these lists. Errors here in terms of counting, in how I’ve marked books LGBTQ or POC are my own, and so forth, are all my own. Since I haven’t read all of these books, some of these are educated guesses.

Now…what do those “best of 2014” YA fiction lists look like this year?

Gender Representation In “Best Of” Lists


When it comes to male and female authors, who has more slots on the “best of” lists?

Out of the 59 authors represented, 18 were men and 41 were female. This isn’t a surprising ratio at all, though it certainly looks a lot different than the ratio we see on the New York Times Bestsellers List. While I’m not going to draw comparisons in this post, I can say that this ratio is smaller than in previous years of looking at this data — there are more men represented in 2014 than in previous years. 
It’s really challenging to look at how main character gender breaks down, but I gave it a go. To make it a little easier, I’ve broken the data into three pieces: male main characters, female main characters, and a third segment, cast of characters. For books with two main characters alternating voices, they’ve been counted in their respective categories. For books with more than two main characters — How It Went Down and The Unfinished Life of Addison Stone, for example — I’ve put them into the cast of characters category. Those books all featured multiple narrators, multiple “main” voices, and both male and female perspectives. I counted a total of 63 main characters (“cast” was counted as a single number here) and the breakdown looks like this:
There were a total of 37 main characters who were female, 22 who were male, and 4 books featured a cast of each. For what many like to believe of YA being a “female dominated” category, these numbers really do not suggest that. These “best of” lists represent a slice of YA, of course, but they represent a vetted and respected slice of YA — one professionals deem to be the most solid or remarkable of the year (or as the case might be in some places, the books that had really nice marketing budgets and got into the right hands). There were more female-driven narrators for sure, but they were not entirely out of line with male narratives here. 
Last year, I wondered if the perspective was that male-led narratives were “better” or more respected than female-driven ones. This is something I’m still curious about, given how much talk there is that there aren’t books out there with male voices or that there aren’t male YA authors. Both of those claims are false, as anyone who knows anything about YA can tell you, but looking at the hard numbers from these lists only confirms those claims aren’t truths. There ARE more female led books, but it doesn’t mean male led books don’t exist. They make up 35% of the “best of” lists this year! 
Debut Authors 

How good are the chances of making a “best of” list when you’re a debut author? Note that all four of these lists appeared before YALSA’s announcement of the five Morris finalists. That, I think, is a good thing, since there could be no influence.
As always, my definition of “debut” is purist. This is a first book. My one exception to this is the same one made for the Morris — if it’s an author’s first book in English for a US audience, I consider it a debut. This was the case in one title included. I included authors as “debut” if they had published in or edited an anthology in the past, as that was the case in a couple of authors. 
More than 1/4 of the books on this year’s lists were written by debut authors, for a total of 16 books written by debuts. This is a really nice showing of new voices within “best of” lists. It’s been my suspicion this year has been a great one for debut authors, and I think that has been playing out in these lists, as well as other year-end round-ups. 
What about gender of debut authors? 
One-quarter of the debuts this year were male, while the rest were female. That breaks down into 4 men and 12 women. 
Back to the note on Morris titles: of the books that landed on the Morris list, four out of five of them also appeared on the “best of” lists: The Story of Owen, The Strange and Beautiful Sorrows of Ava Lavender, Gabi, A Girl in Pieces, and The Carnival at Bray. 
“Best Of” By Genre

Every year, this is the hardest breakdown for me, since genre is so fluid. How do you decide exactly what category a book belongs in if you haven’t read it? Or even if you HAVE read it, the breakdowns can be really challenging. One thing is for sure, though: there are zero paranormal titles hanging with the “best of” crowd this year. 
I took a stab at making these genres make sense, and from looking at the titles, my own reading knowledge, as well as other reviews, I pulled out eight main genres: realistic (which includes those books inexplicably set in the 90s, a trend that I have been over for a couple years now), science fiction, fantasy, horror/fantasy, mystery, historical, magical realism, and historical fantasy. 
A caveat here: there are 56 titles being considered here, rather than just 55. Because Scott Westerfeld’s Afterworlds could fall into either the realistic or the fantasy category, depending on the reader, I didn’t want to make a call. I decided to include it in both.
Realistic fiction had a strong showing this year, but it’s also a little bit deceiving. Because there were a number of subgenres of fantasy represented, it could easily be said that fantasy held its own, too. In fact, let’s look at this genre breakdown as we collapse the subgenres into the larger one. All of the books within the “horror/fantasy” subgenre are more fantasy than they are realistic, so I’m putting them in that grouping. 
And if I went ahead and made magical realism a subgenre of fantasy, then it looks like this:
Fantasy outpaced realistic fiction by one book. The two genres eclipsed science fiction, mystery, and the single, lone book in the historical fiction genre. 
Frequency of “Best of” List Appearances

Was there a big spread of titles across this year’s “best of” lists or did many titles end up on many lists? This is a little bit of a false category in that some of the publications — Horn Book, for example — had a very tiny number of titles that fit the criteria I set. Other publications, like Kirkus, had a big number of titles on their list that fit the criteria. 
Some publications that put their lists out very early, like Publishers Weekly, always fascinate me because I wonder how much it may (or may not) influence the appearance of titles on other lists. In other words, is there a “first!” pride in naming a title the best? These numbers won’t shed light on that, but they do show whether some titles were really popular among all of the “best” lists.
Only two books appeared on all four of the “best” lists — We Were Liars by E Lockhart and This One Summer by Jillian and Mariko Tamaki. The vast majority of books landed on one list, and that list would be Kirkus’s. 
Out of curiosity, I wanted to know how the books on the “best of” list shook out when it came to starred reviews earned. I used Jen J’s spreadsheet, as noted above, which includes starred reviews from Kirkus, Booklist, The Bulletin of the Center for Children’s Books, School Library Journal, Publisher’s Weekly, and Horn Book. That means titles have the chance to have up to six stars. 
Most of the books on the “best of” list earned 1 or 2 starred reviews. Out of the 55 books, only two earned six stars: This One Summer and Glory O’Brien’s History of the Future. 
This One Summer by the Tamakis landed on all four lists and earned six starred reviews. It is, by this measure, the most decorated and distinguished YA novel in 2014. 
As for the entire breakdown of starred reviews and list honors, here’s the spreadsheet:
Sometimes the more stars earned means the more likely the book will appear on multiple “best of” lists and sometimes, it doesn’t. In general, this year looked to be more spread out in terms of the titles being given a “best of” designation. 
“Best of” By Publication Date

One really interesting thing I read in the reports by YALSA committee chairs for an upcoming board meeting was that books published in the latter half of the year had a distinct disadvantage when it came to being considered for the Morris award, which announces its finalists in early December. This is something I have always thought about, especially when it comes to these “best of” lists. While it’s great to announce them in early November or even the first week of December, what about the books that are published later? Reviews are obviously reading all year long, but how easily would a smaller title from a smaller publisher with a not-so-huge marketing budget fall under the radar? Most people know that “big books” are published in the March – May range, as well as the September – October range. That’s not a hard-and-fast rule nor universal, but spend a little time looking at publication frequency, budgets, when book publication dates change, and so forth, and you see the patterns. 
Here’s when the books published each month:
If you look at the first half of the year against the last half of the year, the divide is almost exactly even: 28 of the “best of” titles published between January and the end of June, while 27 published between July and December. October was the most frequent month — how much is that due to fresh memory of titles when list-making time happens? There were zero books published in December on these lists, and there was only one title from the months of November and June. 
Again, nothing can be said about this, but it is interesting to speculate. 


“Best of” By Publisher

How diverse were the publishers represented on the lists? Did we see Candlewick doing really well, as seems to be the case every single year?
I’ve collapsed imprints into their bigger house, so First Second, Tor, and St Martins fall under Macmillan. 
This chart is difficult to read, but breaking it into two charts throws off scaling, which is even more problematic. Everything to the right of Macmillan, which reaches 6 and is in dark blue, lands at one title each. These are primarily smaller publishers, like Pyr, Soho Teen, Holiday House, Algonquin, and so forth. 
Penguin had the most representation on this year’s lists, with 8 books, followed by Random House at 7, Macmillan at 6, and — as always, this makes me so happy — Candlewick had 5. 
While Penguin and Random House are now one publishing house, I chose to keep them separate. Putting them together is really fascinating though: they certainly dominate then, with a total of 15 titles on the “best of” lists. 

Collapsing the publishers down by whether they’re a “Big 5/6” or smaller, the “Big 5/6” have a total of 32 titles on the list, while the mid-size and small publishers have 23. Not a bad split at all. 


LGBTQ and POC Representation on “Best of” Lists

This was a watershed year for discussion of diversity in the publishing world. While it’s always been there, this year, in comparison to prior years, it was a much bigger, more vocal discussion. But did it make any impact on the books on these lists? 
It would be a tease to compare to years past in this post, but the long and the short of it is that the answer is no.
As noted above, I used my own knowledge, research, and consultation with Malinda Lo to pull out the books which featured main characters who identified as LGBTQ or which had significant story lines that involved LGBTQ themes or situations. Where Malinda doesn’t count Sarah McCarry’s About A Girl since it’s not necessarily overt, I have included it, since I thought it was a big enough thread to merit inclusion. I do not look at author’s sexuality when looking at LGBTQ because this is too difficult to gauge without knowing the authors — it’s not obvious, sexuality is fluid, and not all authors choose to self-identify in their bios or information available about them. 
Out of the 55 books, a total of 6 books fit the LGBTQ criteria. That would be 10% of the list. 
What about representation of racial diversity? Because finding information about authors and their racial backgrounds is easier, I fold them into the same category as I do main characters of color. For books where the author is a person of color and their main character is a person of color, I counted it only once. Some authors, whose background may be difficult to distinguish, I reached out to them or to those who know them for confirmation. 
Out of the 55 books and 59 authors, there was a count of 14 writers/main characters of color. That’s roughly 24%. 
What about books that feature or are written by people of color that feature LGBTQ main characters or plot elements? 
2.
It’s still very straight and very white on the “best of” lists. 
It’s worth noting again, though, that some of the books DO feature secondary characters who aren’t straight or aren’t white; those have been noted in the spreadsheet. 

Miscellaneous Data

Let’s wrap this up with a couple more pieces of data that are interesting, even if they’re not necessarily important ones. 
First, there were a total of 49 books published as hardcovers, 3 published as paperback originals, and 3 published as split runs (meaning both hardcover and paperbacks published at the same time). 
Three of the books were novels in verse, and I include Jenny Hubbard’s And We Stay in this count, even though it’s only partially in verse. I did not include Gabi, A Girl in Pieces, though it does include poetry in it. This list also had 3 graphic novels and 1 book in an “alternative” format — The Unfinished Life of Addison Stone‘s interview-format made it worth putting into a category all of its own. 
I’ve always looked at country of origin on these lists, too, as they often seem like they feature a lot of books by authors who aren’t from the US. This year, there were a total of 40 authors who were from the US, and there were 18 from outside the US. I did not include information on one of the illustrators, as I could find nothing about her in my research and didn’t want to make assumptions either way in terms of her country of origin (I did find enough to know other data about her, as reflected above). 
Finally, I broke out books by whether or not they were stand alones or part of a series. There were 39 stand alone titles and 16 books that were part of a series. This included “loose” series, like Dirty Wings. Of the books in a series, I found where they fell within their series to be one of the most interesting pieces of data — where you’d suspect almost entirely first or final books in a series to hit these “best of” lists, it turns out that this year was a good year for books in the middle of a series-in-progress. There was one book that was a final in a series, 10 that were first in a series, and 5 that fell somewhere in the middle. 

So…What Now?


Nothing can be made from this data. It doesn’t mean anything, especially pulled from its context. But nevertheless, it’s interesting to look at and speculate upon because it does give a glimpse into the year of YA as deemed by professionals and experts on YA.

Were there any surprises in this data? Any titles that did or didn’t make the lists that were curious?

One thing I keep wondering about and have zero explanation for — and would love to read some theories about — is why Andrew Smith’s Grasshopper Jungle earned more acclaim from review journals and “best of” lists than his second release this year, 100 Sideways Miles, which was a title on the National Book Awards long list. I thought it was a more accomplished, literary, and full novel (not to mention it portrayed females as actual dynamic characters, rather than as props for use by the male heroes). It was surprising Smith didn’t have both books pop up on these “best of” lists.