• STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

STACKED

books

  • STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

Persuasion by Jane Austen

February 8, 2017 |

persuasion austenI’ve only ever read one other Jane Austen book (Pride and Prejudice, unsurprisingly). I chose Persuasion next based pretty much on the age of the main character: 27, older than all of Austen’s other heroines. I liked the idea of the two leads reconnecting after several years apart, of how a very young love could have developed, changed, and strengthened over those years. Persuasion is a story about a mistake made while young that is rectified later on; it’s about how we change, but there are some parts of us that remain the same.

Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth fell in love when Anne was nineteen and Frederick was a 20-something naval officer. Anne is persuaded by one of her mentor-friends Lady Russell that a match with Frederick is not suitable for a person in her station, and she breaks it off. She regrets it for the next eight years, when Frederick reappears, now a captain. They reconnect because Frederick’s sister is a tenant at Kellynch Hall, Anne’s family’s home, which is being rented out in order to save the Elliots from financial ruin.

Like Pride and Prejudice, much is communicated between Anne and Frederick without words. There are looks and gestures, each subject to interpretation and misinterpretation, and each is unsure whether the other feels the same as they did eight years ago. Frederick is still smarting from Anne’s rejection, wondering if she is weak of character, to be persuaded so easily. Of course, as he becomes reacquainted with her, he finds himself just as much in love with her as before. Anne, too, harbors her doubts – could Frederick forgive her for her mistake? Could he still love her?

We as readers are never in doubt of the happy ending, but getting there is a treat. Austen’s ancillary characters are hilarious here. I loved all of their conversations about what type of person makes the best tenant, whether being in the navy (or any profession) ages men prematurely, and how men and women each think of romantic love. Anne’s sister Mary is particularly funny, unintentionally on her part, as she is somewhat of a hypochondriac and a complainer and no one is particularly happy to spend much time with her. She always seems to be around, though, because not inviting her along would be rude, even if she wouldn’t enjoy the occasion anyway. We all know this person.

What really makes this book, though, is a letter from Frederick to Anne near the end. It beats any letter or speech in Pride and Prejudice and whenever I want a pick me up, I re-read it and place my hand over my heart and sigh. Quite literally. I’ve reproduced it for you below so you can do the same if you so desire.

I can listen no longer in silence. I must speak to you by such means as are within my reach. You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope. Tell me not that I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone for ever. I offer myself to you again with a heart even more your own than when you almost broke it, eight years and a half ago. Dare not say that man forgets sooner than woman, that his love has an earlier death. I have loved none but you. Unjust I may have been, weak and resentful I have been, but never inconstant. You alone have brought me to Bath. For you alone, I think and plan. Have you not seen this? Can you fail to have understood my wishes? I had not waited even these ten days, could I have read your feelings, as I think you must have penetrated mine. I can hardly write. I am every instant hearing something which overpowers me. You sink your voice, but I can distinguish the tones of that voice when they would be lost on others. Too good, too excellent creature! You do us justice, indeed. You do believe that there is true attachment and constancy among men. Believe it to be most fervent, most undeviating, in F. W.

I must go, uncertain of my fate; but I shall return hither, or follow your party, as soon as possible. A word, a look, will be enough to decide whether I enter your father’s house this evening or never.

Is there anything more romantic than “You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope”? I am hopeless sometimes.

Filed Under: classics, Reviews

The Year of the Canon

January 25, 2017 |

i know why the caged bird singsLate last year, I decided 2017 would be the year I dove more fully into the literary canon. I was an English major (you are all shocked), and when I graduated and no longer had to read the classics for my classes, it was a real joy to dive into books that were as far from that category as possible: YA dystopias, adult mysteries, popular nonfiction, and lots of Harry Potter re-reads.

Lately, though, I’ve been wanting to inject more variety into my reading. Despite all the reading I did for my degree, my knowledge of the (English language) literary canon is not as expansive as I wish it were. It will be ten years this December since I graduated with my BA, so 2017 seems like a good time to revisit some of my roots, to broaden them, and in so doing, learn more about our cultural history.

The first book I chose was I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou. I expect most of the books I read for this project will be audiobook reads, and this was a great one to kick it off, since Angelou reads it herself. She’s got such a unique voice and cadence, and her story of her first sixteen years of life is engrossing, painful, and important. It’s also full of joy and humor in many parts. I like a good memoir, and there’s no doubt that Angelou’s is among the best, both in terms of content and writing style.

I have read a lot of the classics already, of course; favorites include Jane Eyre, Frankenstein, The Color Purple, and A Christmas Carol. There are definitely some I like less (Mrs. Dalloway, A Tale of Two Cities, Wuthering Heights), and a couple I loathe (Absalom, Absalom!, The Great Gatsby). I look forward to adding more titles to each category this year.

I’ve made a list of some authors I’d like to read more of for this project, including Jane Austen, Toni Morrison, Salman Rushdie, and Ernest Hemingway. I want to try a few more Dickens titles and finally read The Catcher in the Rye. I want to check out classic adventure tales like Robinson Crusoe and read newer additions to the literary canon like Things Fall Apart and The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. I want to broaden the idea of what our English language literary canon should be, too, and I hope you’ll help me do so by commenting with a recommendation for a book you loved.

Filed Under: classics, reading life

Classics: Those I Love & Those I Love to Hate

January 9, 2014 |

We don’t talk much about adult classics here at Stacked, but I’m always interested by readers’ reactions to them. When I’m struggling to find common reading ground with other adults, asking them their opinion on Austen or Faulkner will often elicit some interesting discussion. As an English major in college, I read my fair share of the classics; I’ve only recently embraced the fact that I’m free to despise many of them (and I do).

This post is dedicated to sharing my antipathy. (I’ll include a hefty dose of classics I did like for some balance.) I apologize in advance if I excoriate your favorite. Feel free to tell me how wrong I am in the comments.

Absalom, Absalom by William Faulkner
Really, I could list the entire Faulkner canon here, but let’s not be greedy. I don’t take exception to the content or plot. Instead, it’s Faulkner’s style I dislike so much. Paragraphs and punctuation are two of writing’s greatest inventions. Completely eschewing them isn’t an effective stylistic choice, it’s a mess.

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald 
It’s amazing how such a short book can manage to be so dull. I could never bring myself to care about Gatsby, much less be interested in any aspect of his life.


A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens
This is a strange one for me to dislike, since the plot is actually pretty interesting and quite moving. Dickens’ style is just not my cup of tea.

Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte
I don’t hate this one as actively as the others, but it’s pretty high on the list. Peopled with an astonishing number of characters I just want to strangle, I found it neither romantic (which is fine – it’s not necessary supposed to be) nor compelling. I did find it bloated and tedious, though.

And now for a change of pace, a few classics I really love:

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
Perhaps this is an obvious one, but I love this book. My love for it didn’t crystallize until I re-read it in a college class and we talked at length about the “Reader, I married him” line. I love its exciting plot, how Jane grows to love such an imperfect – and arguably not very good – man, and most of all, how she comes into her own as an individual.

The Color Purple by Alice Walker
I’ve never before or since read a book as simultaneously horrible and hopeful as this one. 

Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
Reading this one as an established SFF fan was really illuminating – I loved seeing how Shelley used the tropes I had always taken for granted. The fact that she wrote it at age 18 was inspiring, too.

Which classics do you love/hate?

Filed Under: classics, Uncategorized

Looking Back at the Classics: The Best and The Missed

March 16, 2012 |

My reading habits have changed a lot in the last few years — in college, I pretty much only read “classics,” even as fun reading outside of being an English major. It was that or adult literary fiction, with periodic non-fiction thrown in. Then when I went to library school, I was a heavy adult non-fiction reader. I did dabble in a bit of young adult fiction both in college and in library school, but certainly not to the extent I do now.

Even though I’m way more reluctant to pick up classics now, I often think about the ones I read and loved and how much they influence how I read today. I also think a lot about the classics I didn’t read that it seems everyone else has read and tell myself someday I will read them (really). I thought it could be fun to talk about the lasting influences, as well as talk about what I haven’t read in hopes of maybe being convinced to give something new a try. 

Favorites

For me, the reading experience of classics is influenced a lot by time and place, maybe more than any other type of book. I can remember where I was when I read each of these the first time and I can remember what it felt like to experience the novel in a way I can’t always do with other books. I wonder how much it has to do with classics being a sort of collective experience, since books become “classics” through generations of reading.

Moby Dick is a pretty contentious title I’ve learned — it’s either LOVED or it’s HATED, and there’s very little ground between. But you can put me squarely on the side of thinking this is one of the all-time greatest novels. It’s long, it’s long-winded, delving into whaling and life on a whaling vessel and really, it’s a story about life and people. Ahab is obsessed with finding this whale because it’s his life duty to finally win this war once and for all. Except fighting nature, fighting the creatures outside of yourself as some sort of justification for existence, doesn’t quite work that way. The story is brilliant, and Melville makes it even better because the writing itself is poetic. It is almost entirely a metaphor, which I love without shame. There’s certainly a story but oh, it’s so much more in the story that’s not being told than in the one being presented. Moby Dick is an untouchable book for me — nothing will ever quite live up to it in my mind. I’m extremely curious how China Mieville draws on Melville’s book for inspiration in his forthcoming Railsea.

When I was in library school, I had access to one of the best special collections libraries in the world, and one of my classes required that we do an in-depth appraisal on a rare book. Of course, I picked this one, and getting the opportunity to spend a long time with an original of Moby Dick only made it that much more meaningful.

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Bronte is my favorite Bronte work (which you’ll see is an unfair statement soon). It features a strong, independent woman in a time when they weren’t celebrated in literature — kind of ironic given that Bronte couldn’t publish this under her own name, but under the more “masculine” name Acton Bell. In the book, Gilbert becomes obsessed with the reclusive Helen, who lives in Wildfell Hall with her young son. The townspeople have given her quite a reputation, and despite some reluctance on Gilbert’s part, he’s still fascinated by Helen. Eventually, she lets him in on all of the terrible things that happened in her last marriage, why she left, and why she is who she is now. I’m hit and miss with Victorian lit, but this one is and will always be among my favorites because Helen is a hell of a character and she feels so, so much. Oh, and this is told in dual narrative too, so readers get both Helen’s voice and Gilbert’s.

One of my all-time favorite movies is Malena — it’s the story of a woman who moves to a small Sicily town while her husband serves in World War II. She’s beautiful, and she’s a threat to all of the other people in town because of this, and she endures a sort of humiliation no one deserves because of it. The story’s not told through her eyes, though; it’s told through the eyes of a 12-year-old boy who is fascinated with who this woman really is. Although the movie isn’t based on Bronte’s story, every time I watch it I can’t help but think about Helen and Tenant of Wildfell Hall. In both, strong, independent women being pushed to the margins of their communities because of cattiness, gossip, and a lack of interest in getting to know the whole person within (or the kinds of pain she carries).

Return of the Soldier by Rebecca West is arguably the first novel that deals with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Written in 1918, West’s story follows Chris as he reunites with three women who have played a huge role in his life. The problem is, he can’t really remember them or what they really meant to him before the war took a toll on his mental state. Chris is unable to remember his wife or his cousin when he returns home, and he believes the poor, unkempt Mrs. Grey is his wife. It’s a story about love and sacrifice, and it’s one wrought with desperation. Of course Chris’s wife wants him back for herself, and she wants him to be better. The thing is, neither she nor his cousin can figure out the way to cure him or whether they have the right to make him better themselves. This is a short book — one I think I read in a couple hours — but it’s an emotional powerhouse.

   
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey is one I think everyone knows or at least has heard of. When I was in 6th grade, I had my first male teacher, and he was a hulking, scary kind of teacher — over six feet tall, build big, and he had a booming voice. The kind of guy you don’t mess around with. He knew I was a reader, even back then, and I will never forget him telling me that the only book that ever scared him was Kesey’s book, but that I was too young to read and appreciate it for what it was. He told me to read it later — and I did. I don’t know if I would go as far as to say it scared me, but I would say it gave me a lot of chills. It’s not so much the mental ward setting, though that’s certainly something that always does put me in a certain state when reading. It was the social dynamics that made this book one of my favorites — it’s the little guys vs the big guys. It’s a story where those without power try to get it. Oh, and it’s told through the eyes of the character who won’t talk to anyone but it’s in his power of observation that the story really unfolds. This is the kind of book I keep hoping will be visited in some way in a ya retelling/revisioning because it is so ripe for it. I’ve seen the movie more times than I can count but the book does it better.

When I was in high school, I wrote book reviews for the high school newspaper (and music reviews, too, and no, I won’t brag and talk about how I interviewed people like Matt Nathanson before he was who he is today, not at all). One of the books I reviewed was In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, and since that day, I’ve revisited this novel many, many times. It’s still a favorite. I won’t go as far as to say this is a true crime story, because I’m fairly certain Capote took many liberties in reporting, but this is a novel about the 1959 murders of the Clutter family in small-town Holcomb, Kansas. It follows the actual murders, the investigation into the crime, and the uncovering of the murderers and subsequent sentencing of them. Capote’s book melds everything I love about journalism with traditional storytelling, and it probably left me more terrified and scared than any horror book I’ve read — true events, especially random murder in an average town, is so much scarier than ghosts or vampires or the undead. Although it’s probably not a classic in the sense that Melville’s book is, it is a classic in my mind and it’s got lasting power.

A handful of other favorite classics include Nathaniel Hawthorn’s The Scarlet Letter, Shakespeare’s King Lear and Twelfth Night, Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio (which, true story, I wrote a play based off one summer for a play-writing class I took) and Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass (if “I Sing the Body Electric” doesn’t give you chills when you read it, I’m not sure we’d get along well — it is one of the best pieces of poetry in existence).

Classics Unread

I’m part shamed and maybe part proud I haven’t read some of these. But I’m putting it out there to maybe be convinced that one or all of these are worth the time to visit in the near future.

Confession: I have not read any Jane Austen. Actually, I take that back. I’ve been sitting about 40 pages in Sense and Sensibility for over a year now, and I read one of Austen’s short stories. I took a class in Victorian Lit (see the Anne Bronte book above) and had one of my favorite professors, who told me that if I wanted to start somewhere with Austen, to read her short story “Lady Susan.” “Lady Susan” was the only thing Austen ever wrote that she hated and wished she hadn’t written, so of course I read it. It’s dark! I loved it! But after that, I never found myself compelled to finish a novel of hers. I’ve got copies of Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, and, yes, The Complete Works of Jane Austen on my book shelf. They’ve been great dust collectors.

Another author I can put on the “haven’t read a single work from” list is Virginia Woolf. Maybe not entirely remarkable, but seeing I was assigned To the Lighthouse on more than one occasion in school and that I have copies of many of her books, it is pretty noteworthy. I’m not sure I wouldn’t like her works, but I’m not entirely sure I would be sucked into the writing. I’ve been told The Years would probably be a good place to start.

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte is another one of my “haven’t read” books. I’ve read both of Anne Bronte’s titles, and I’ve read Emily Bronte’s Wuthering Heights, but I haven’t ventured into Charlotte’s work. I do feel a little lost because I haven’t read this one, especially since it happens to make appearances in so much contemporary fiction.

The Odyssey and The Iliad by Homer are books I never read, either. And I have to be completely honest and say neither has appeal to me as a reader, so I’m almost glad I’ve missed out. I realize the foundation they both play in a lot of literature afterward, but I’ve gotten by this far and figure I’ll be good for a while longer.

William Golding’s The Lord of the Flies is sort of a big one to miss, and it’s one I know got read in high school. Except I took a class where instead of reading the books most high schoolers read, we were given more esoteric (read: more awesome) picks, including Les Miserables. I do want to read this one at some point because I know it’s a bit brutal, and that’s always up my alley.

Maybe I’m being a little generous calling Bram Stoker’s Dracula a classic, but there it is. I haven’t read it, and I’ve been told more than once how fantastic a read it is. I have read many modern retellings or revisionings of this one, but I haven’t read the original itself.

Who I’d Like to Read or Revisit

A few bonus titles! There are so many classics I’ve meant to read or have read and didn’t appreciate the first time I read it for one reason or another. It’s my hope in revisiting these (or experiencing the first time) will help me find new favorites for my top list.

I read My Antonia and O Pioneers! and I believe a number of short stories by Willa Cather in high school, and I remember hating them quite passionately. The thing is, now that I’ve spent real time in the Midwest and have come to really like it here, I feel like I’d have a different appreciation for Cather’s books.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich has been recommended to me numerous times, and given my prior experience enjoying Russian Lit, I think this is one I have to get to eventually. It’s the story of Ivan, who is a labor-camp worker in one of Stalin’s work camps. It’s supposed to be quite graphic and a great portrait of an individual trying to find some sort of dignity when there was none to be had.

I grew up just south of Chicago, and I find it a bit of a shame I haven’t read any Raymond Chandler, seeing he was not only regaled as one of the leaders in mystery/detective fiction, but he was also a Chicagoan by birth (which, to be fair, I haven’t read Sinclair Lewis either, but there’s something much more appealing about reading a mystery than reading about the south side slaughter houses). The Big Sleep is Chandler’s most well-known novel and it seems like a good place to start . . . whenever I get the chance to.

I have been told by everyone who has survived reading Henry David Thoreau’s Walden that it’s one I don’t have to read but I find that to be a challenge, rather than a warning. I’ve had to memorize a good chunk of this book before (“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately…”) and I’m fascinated to read the entirety of Walden because of that.

Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov is a book I have not one, but two copies of, in my collection. Yet, I haven’t read it. I carry a certain amount of shame for not having read this one, too.

Last, but not least, I am anxious to some day reread J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye. I used to read this book every year in high school and I read it a couple times in college. I tried reading it in library school, but in the process of having it checked out from the library, I lost it, then ended up paying for it and finding it months later. Long story longer, I kind of feel like this is the kind of book that I would find obnoxious now, even though I loved it back in the day. The sort of book you measure your own maturity and growth against, whether that’s fair or not. I’m curious whether Holden stands out at all or it’s the secondary characters who come to the forefront of the story.

So now tell me, what should I be reading? And maybe what I’m more interested in hearing — what classics have you loved or missed? Why? What makes a classic work for you?

Filed Under: classics, Favorite Picks, Uncategorized

Riffs on the Tale – A Rant

July 9, 2010 |

Yesterday, Kelly posted about the phenomenon of the mash-up: the original text of classic tales infused with monsters. Sounds fun and it’s a clever marketing ploy, what with the current flood of vampire and zombie stuff out there. I thought the first one, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, was a cute idea.
I’m going to be honest and say that I haven’t read any of the mash-ups. But I hate them. Hate hate hate them. Hate them more than nuts in chocolate (WHY do people ruin perfectly good chocolate in this way?). Hate them more than I hate having to deal with cranky library patrons. Hate hate hate.
Whew.
Why do I hate them? Let’s explore what nearly all of the mash-ups have in common: they are almost all classic novels written by female authors and/or featuring female protagonists. I think the best way to explain my feelings is to make a list of the mash-ups I know about, which I have done below (note that these are strictly mash-ups, not original stories, so it excludes Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter, as well as the one about Queen Victoria):
  • Pride and Prejudice and Zombies – female author (fa), female protagonist (fp)
  • Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters – fa, fp
  • Little Vampire Women – fa, fp
  • Little Women and Werewolves – fa, fp
  • Jane Slayre – fa, fp
  • Mansfield Park and Mummies – fa, fp
  • Emma and the Werewolves – fa, fp
  • Android Karenina – fp
  • Alice in Zombieland – fp
  • The Undead World of Oz – fp
  • Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Zombie Jim
As you can see, even the books written by a male author still feature female protagonists, with the sole exception of Twain. (This is the point where I invite you to add to my list, with the hope that there are more mash-ups that feature male protagonists out there.)  I’m predicting right here and now that the next mash-up will be Wuthering Heights.  Soon, though, these hacks are going to run out of public domain titles to butcher (a good thing, but also shows the appalling lack of female classic literature out there).
It’s no secret that most of the books Western society considers part of the classic canon are written by men and feature men, so the argument that this is merely coincidental is clearly untrue. What does the mash-up trend have to say about our society’s views of literature written by women and featuring women? I’ll venture a few ideas:
Our society thinks female-driven literature isn’t good enough to stand on its own, that it doesn’t appeal to enough people to make it worthwhile reading by itself, that it needs something extra to make it worth our time. Our society thinks female protagonists in classic literature aren’t sufficiently “bad-ass” or interesting enough, that they need either more violence or more humor or both. Our society views female written and female-driven literature as inherently frivolous (the characters, the events, the themes) and thus these books are perfect for the monster mash-up, which is meant to be frivolous and fun and nothing more. I could go on.
Please, give me your thoughts in the comments. I know I’m not alone, since I’ve read similar rants elsewhere. I really don’t think I’m blowing this out of proportion.

Filed Under: big issues, classics, Uncategorized

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Search

Archives

We dig the CYBILS

STACKED has participated in the annual CYBILS awards since 2009. Click the image to learn more.

© Copyright 2015 STACKED · All Rights Reserved · Site Designed by Designer Blogs