• STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

STACKED

books

  • STACKED
  • About Us
  • Categories
    • Audiobooks
    • Book Lists
      • Debut YA Novels
      • Get Genrefied
      • On The Radar
    • Cover Designs
      • Cover Doubles
      • Cover Redesigns
      • Cover Trends
    • Feminism
      • Feminism For The Real World Anthology
      • Size Acceptance
    • In The Library
      • Challenges & Censorship
      • Collection Development
      • Discussion and Resource Guides
      • Readers Advisory
    • Professional Development
      • Book Awards
      • Conferences
    • The Publishing World
      • Data & Stats
    • Reading Life and Habits
    • Romance
    • Young Adult
  • Reviews + Features
    • About The Girls Series
    • Author Interviews
    • Contemporary YA Series
      • Contemporary Week 2012
      • Contemporary Week 2013
      • Contemporary Week 2014
    • Guest Posts
    • Link Round-Ups
      • Book Riot
    • Readers Advisory Week
    • Reviews
      • Adult
      • Audiobooks
      • Graphic Novels
      • Non-Fiction
      • Picture Books
      • YA Fiction
    • So You Want to Read YA Series
  • Review Policy

Ten truths about blogging

November 29, 2010 |

In the last couple of weeks, we’ve read a lot of posts in the blogosphere about reviewing and about blogging in general. While we have a *lot* to say on the topic, we decided as a team to offer something a little different — our ten truths about blogging. This is a collaborative post, the three of us spending a long time discussing many of these issues and feeling the need to put them out there. We would love your feedback and thoughts. Feel free to share widely.

#1: This isn’t our job.

We do not get paid to blog. We do not participate in Amazon Associates or Adsense to bring in spare change. We all work as full time librarians and do this out of a love of reading and sharing books.

An easy 60-70% of the giveaways we do are paid for out of our own pocket. As in, we buy the books and pay the shipping. We are lucky to work with a few companies that help us out along the way, but the bulk we do out of the love of getting books into readers’ hands.

We spend a couple hours a week writing our posts, and sometimes we’re able to produce a few weeks’ worth of content in a day. But we certainly aren’t blogging every day, though it seems like it. We work around our schedules to make this work.

We bring this one up in the case of authors or publicists who insist on deadlines for reading or reviewing titles. It simply can’t happen. We read what we want to read and what we love to read. Much of what we read we don’t even end up reviewing, but is just read for fun or to help us in our jobs. Want to know everything we read? You can see the good, the bad, and the ugly on our GoodReads accounts.

We are open to many pitches, but those with strings attached and tight time lines make us itchy. If you want your book reviewed, let us do it on our own or give us enough head time to do it (2-3 months is pretty reasonable). The caveat to this is that we 100% follow requests for holding off on reviews until pub date. If you tell us this, you can expect we will follow without question.

This is our passion, not our job.

#2: There are jerks out there. Some of them are even authors or other bloggers.

Some people see authors as celebrities, and it’s easy to understand why. But a jerk’s a jerk, no matter what way they fall. There are authors who don’t know how to use tact or style and some who are downright creepy in how they approach you.

We understand how hard it is to have your work out there and have it judged. It’s your baby. But attacking a blogger for sharing an opinion of the work — and remember, they write their reviews of the work and not you personally — is downright classless. In a world that grows smaller and smaller thanks to the Internet, your words will come back to haunt you.

And for bloggers, take note: anyone can sniff out a phony. It’s easy to see who does this for free stuff. It’s easy to see who just tries to gain followers with no substance. We know and we talk.

#3: Respect privacy.

We do not, under any circumstances, share the emails or the private conversations that go on between ourselves and authors, publishers, or other bloggers. We have received some real hoots, but we don’t post them. We don’t make these things accessible for just anyone. We respect the privacy of those who choose to communicate with us. Many of these relationships are meant to be private, and private they should stay. As much as it’s tempting to pull up a post and paste into it some of the ridiculous pitches or share a conversation with an author, we don’t.

You shouldn’t either.

#4: There are a lot of bad books out there.

Bad books are published all the time, and not just by vanity presses. We’ve all read our fair share of bad books. Some we give up on at the fifty page mark, some we struggle through to the end, hoping the book will magically transform itself into something worthwhile.

While we’ve noticed that some bloggers choose to only review those books they enjoy, that’s not how we do it at STACKED. Our blog isn’t a place for us to list only the latest and greatest. It’s also a place to discuss the books that let us down and why. It’s never a personal attack against the author, but we’re honest and upfront. Some books are just bad. That doesn’t mean they won’t have an audience, and we do our best to identify that audience. Crappy books do still get lots of love from some people (and sometimes a lot of people). But we’ll still call a spade a spade.

#5: It doesn’t happen over night.

Blogging isn’t easy. Getting readers isn’t easy. But it gets easier with time. Your reviews get smoother, your style more refined, and you realize you do have a lot to say that’s insightful or different from what else is being said.

We began STACKED in April 2009, a year and a half ago. We talked to a void. We got emails from our parents saying they read our blog thing. We were lucky to remember to post once a week.

Here we are in December 2010, and we have posts and plans for posts well on through June of next year. We have nearly 10,000 unique page views a month. That doesn’t count the hundreds of subscribers we have or people who are kind enough to come back more than once. We plan our posts on a weekly basis, making sure we have something running Monday through Friday.

Keep working. It’s hard. Sometimes it feels thankless, and sometimes it feels like you are literally writing in a void. But get your name out there. And see #6 and #7 for what really works.

#6: Being engaged with books and the book community is essential.

It’s important not to restrict your discussion of books and reading to your blog. Other online social avenues – such as Goodreads and Twitter – are excellent places to promote your blog, but they’re also a great way to get involved and become more fully immersed in the reading world. Don’t just link to your most recent posts (but do be sure to do this). Link to other posts you see and like, comment on other blogs, re-tweet another reader’s insightful one-liner.

Your blog will benefit from both your increased exposure in the online reading world as well as your expanded knowledge of the subject. You’ll find new topics to discuss, new viewpoints to consider, new books to laud or lambaste. Your blog will be more current and relevant and you’ll enjoy the writing of it more. And as always happens when one reads, your writing and reviewing skills will improve.

#7: Don’t be just a self-promoter.

In order to be engaged and in order to develop real opinions and thoughts, you have to share. Don’t just share your stuff. Share what other people say. It is okay to comment on other people’s blogs. It is good to do that. It’s good to retweet and relink things (with proper credit).

Share books between bloggers, too. We’ve exchanged ARC copies, both within ourselves and between other book bloggers that we’ve become friends with. Don’t hog the spotlight. Collaborate and discuss. It makes for a sharper review and a deeper community.

#8: People will steal.

It’s a common phrase that mimicry is the highest form of flattery, but it’s also annoying and often infuriating. The first time it happens, it can be a shock. Unfortunately, ideas, sentences, and even entire passages or entries are stolen within the blogosphere all the time. Often there’s no recourse other than shouting about it online, as the recent Cook’s Source episode shows. Sometimes this can actually produce results.

What this theft shows is how vital it is to credit our sources as bloggers. If a summary comes from Amazon or Goodreads, we say so. If we participate in a meme, we make sure to state where the idea for the meme originated. If another blogger’s post provided the seed for one of our entries, we credit them. It’s not just a courtesy – it’s the only right way to do it.

As for the times when theft occurs? Don’t be silent about it. If you’ve fully engaged yourself in the online book community (see #6), you may find yourself with a surprising number of supporters who are willing to do a good bit of the fighting and shouting for you. If someone’s using your identity, say something. If your review shows up uncredited, post something. This community protects its members, but the only way to get protection is to speak up.

#9: Don’t force a following.

There many blogs out there which require readers to follow their blog in order to enter contests and giveaways, or to gain extra entries. But is this truly a reflection of your following? Or just an extra step that an occasional reader can take in order to profit themselves? True followers will find your blog eventually, if you cultivate and nurture a readership through honest, solid reviews, consistent posting, and engaging content. For many blogs, it may be that the number of ‘followers’ is not an accurate measure of readership. Because we do not force our following, we are more confident in the truth of our statistics. It’s a point of pride and, at times, a total shock to us. We are humbled people read us and interact with us.

#10: Sometimes we write crappy reviews.

Sometimes we have a busy week at work, or things pop up during the weekend, when we were planning to devote a few hours to blogging. Sometimes we’re in a hurry and slap our thoughts onto the page/screen a bit more haphazardly than we would prefer to. Sometimes we summarize the books ourselves, sometimes we don’t have the time or energy to use more than the summary from Goodreads. Or sometimes we just can’t put our finger on what criticism is nagging at the corner of our minds or of what exactly bothers us about a certain character. But we try. We do the best we can. And sometimes it’s just crappy.

But that’s our whole point. We write crappy reviews sometimes. Our blog isn’t perfect. Neither are books. Or authors. Or the blogging community. But we’re here every week, because of our love for literature, our desire to share something with others.
And hopefully you all feel the same way.

Remember, too, to always be respectful of those on this side of the blog. The screen is one dimensional, but we are real, breathing humans. We have feelings. Sometimes, what you say can hurt us. There are days we want to quit doing this. Before you click submit or hit the send button on your computer, take a second to think — REALLY think — about what you’re saying and the impact it might have on someone else.

Filed Under: big issues, blogs, Uncategorized

Riffs on the Tale – A Rant

July 9, 2010 |

Yesterday, Kelly posted about the phenomenon of the mash-up: the original text of classic tales infused with monsters. Sounds fun and it’s a clever marketing ploy, what with the current flood of vampire and zombie stuff out there. I thought the first one, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, was a cute idea.
I’m going to be honest and say that I haven’t read any of the mash-ups. But I hate them. Hate hate hate them. Hate them more than nuts in chocolate (WHY do people ruin perfectly good chocolate in this way?). Hate them more than I hate having to deal with cranky library patrons. Hate hate hate.
Whew.
Why do I hate them? Let’s explore what nearly all of the mash-ups have in common: they are almost all classic novels written by female authors and/or featuring female protagonists. I think the best way to explain my feelings is to make a list of the mash-ups I know about, which I have done below (note that these are strictly mash-ups, not original stories, so it excludes Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter, as well as the one about Queen Victoria):
  • Pride and Prejudice and Zombies – female author (fa), female protagonist (fp)
  • Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters – fa, fp
  • Little Vampire Women – fa, fp
  • Little Women and Werewolves – fa, fp
  • Jane Slayre – fa, fp
  • Mansfield Park and Mummies – fa, fp
  • Emma and the Werewolves – fa, fp
  • Android Karenina – fp
  • Alice in Zombieland – fp
  • The Undead World of Oz – fp
  • Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Zombie Jim
As you can see, even the books written by a male author still feature female protagonists, with the sole exception of Twain. (This is the point where I invite you to add to my list, with the hope that there are more mash-ups that feature male protagonists out there.)  I’m predicting right here and now that the next mash-up will be Wuthering Heights.  Soon, though, these hacks are going to run out of public domain titles to butcher (a good thing, but also shows the appalling lack of female classic literature out there).
It’s no secret that most of the books Western society considers part of the classic canon are written by men and feature men, so the argument that this is merely coincidental is clearly untrue. What does the mash-up trend have to say about our society’s views of literature written by women and featuring women? I’ll venture a few ideas:
Our society thinks female-driven literature isn’t good enough to stand on its own, that it doesn’t appeal to enough people to make it worthwhile reading by itself, that it needs something extra to make it worth our time. Our society thinks female protagonists in classic literature aren’t sufficiently “bad-ass” or interesting enough, that they need either more violence or more humor or both. Our society views female written and female-driven literature as inherently frivolous (the characters, the events, the themes) and thus these books are perfect for the monster mash-up, which is meant to be frivolous and fun and nothing more. I could go on.
Please, give me your thoughts in the comments. I know I’m not alone, since I’ve read similar rants elsewhere. I really don’t think I’m blowing this out of proportion.

Filed Under: big issues, classics, Uncategorized

Two steps forward…

July 7, 2010 |

and one step backward. Check out this forthcoming title about an overweight girl. Sorry, chickie, it’s a donut for you!


Starstruck by Cyn Balog is about a girl whose nickname is Dough and she becomes a total fatty when she moves away from her old home. Longer description available at Lauren’s Crammed Bookshelf.

I get that the family runs a donut shop, so it sort of fits that. But, you know, it’s the theme of fat girls with food on the cover…

Filed Under: aesthetics, big issues, cover designs, Uncategorized

Fat girl alert!

June 26, 2010 |

It’s happened.

It took a long time, and it took a cover redesign, as well as a forthcoming show on ABC Family, but we have come to a day I have been looking forward to for a long time.

How awesome is that? This is an entirely marketable cover. It is appealing and relatable to so many young women out there. It’s not threatening, it’s not mocking, and it is a true representation.

A HUGE thanks goes out to Simon & Schuster for the redesign here. This is so much better than this, this, and this. Let’s not resort to this, this, or this again.

Filed Under: aesthetics, big issues, cover designs, Uncategorized

More Fake Fat Girls

April 13, 2010 |

I realize I bring this up a lot, but this is an issue that really needs to be addressed. This spring and fall will be bringing us more stories of accepting yourself as a fat person — or in some cases, getting in better shape so you can accept yourself as you are. But as you probably guessed, we won’t be seeing any fat girls. Check out the new selection of young adult titles that will bring you more of less.*

Fat girls love ice cream!


Fat girls can be stylish, like Veronica who loves vintage, but we can only show you the dresses while they’re on the hanger.


We can only see the Designated Ugly Fat Friend’s face, and she’s actually quite attractive and doesn’t feature anything fat about her. Oh wait for the new cover design for this one …


YES! We have a face AND food (I’m classifying gum here as food). I love the girl’s freckles, but seriously. She’s still not a. ugly or b. fat.


I think that Bookshelves of Doom covered this one better than I can.

SERIOUSLY? Can we not put a fat girl on a cover, ever? I do not understand why this is so tough and unrealistic. Let me remind you of this and this. As has been shown with the covers of and Liar and Magic Under Glass, we can make a difference. We need people to speak out and speak up. This includes with our wallets.**

* Let me also add this: when we get into these conversations about fat girls on cover, we are also prodding an issue of thinness, too. Inadvertently, thin models and girls are going to feel attacked because of their body. It’s unfair and not right on any level. There IS NO PERFECT, but this is misrepresentation or lack of any representation. It is a lose-lose situation for everyone. If we want to write the books about being ok with yourself, we should also show that fact.

** It’s really a bummer to the authors, too, who work SO HARD to write these books. I’d be curious how they felt about the issue. We shouldn’t punish them since they are trying to do something important.

Filed Under: aesthetics, big issues, cover designs, Uncategorized, Young Adult

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter

Search

Archives

We dig the CYBILS

STACKED has participated in the annual CYBILS awards since 2009. Click the image to learn more.

© Copyright 2015 STACKED · All Rights Reserved · Site Designed by Designer Blogs