Despite those strikes against it, Between is highly engaging, and I credit Warman’s writing for that. Her language flows and she’s created a great character in Liz. She starts out like your stereotypical mean girl, but like in all good books, she grows (despite being dead). And we as readers see that she maybe she wasn’t so two-dimensional in the first place. People aren’t easy, they can’t be pigeonholed, and Liz is no different. In that respect, the book is as much an education for the reader as it is for Liz.
Warman is less successful with Alex. He is vital to the story, and he needs to be present to move the plot along, but that’s all he is: a device. I never felt like I knew Alex beyond his role as a clue for Liz. This is Liz’s story, so this fault doesn’t cripple the book entirely, but it does weaken its impact.
admin says
I agree with all your comments, and I add that it went on just a little too long. This is the second narrated-from-the-dead story I read this year (and I'll post the review of the first one next month) and the elements were quite similar in each.
I found what you said about Alex to be spot on, too. I wish we had gotten to know him more. I guess I wanted more "proof" of why him. I knew, like you did, exactly what happened hundreds of pages before the end of the story, and I get why he was involved in the story, but he was just a device. There were opportunities to ramp up his role, and I wish they'd been taken.
admin says
And as I'd said to you before, this was so Cracked Up to Be meets The Everafter/Before I Fall. The realistic elements with the mystery meeting the speculative of what happens after.
Rachel says
This actually sounds exactly like Christopher Pike's "Remember Me," which was one of my favorite books. It would be interesting to read the story as it's tackled in a less campy way — I love both Cracked Up to Be and Before I Fall.
Ronni says
Have I ever told you that your reviews are some of the best I've read? I always enjoy seeing your take on books. 🙂